Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Not-so-simple nephrectomy: Comparative analysis of radical and simple nephrectomy in a high-volume tertiary referral center.
Papadopoulou, Ariadni; Campain, Nicholas; Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin; Shanmugathas, Nimlan; Poullas, Marios; Mumtaz, Faiz; Barod, Ravi; Tran, Maxine; Bex, Axel; Patki, Prasad.
Afiliação
  • Papadopoulou A; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Campain N; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Abu-Ghanem Y; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Shanmugathas N; Department of Urology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Poullas M; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Mumtaz F; Department of Computer Science, Neapolis University Pafos, Pafos, Cyprus.
  • Barod R; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Tran M; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Bex A; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Patki P; The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Int J Urol ; 31(2): 160-168, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37929800
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Simple nephrectomies can be challenging with significant morbidity. To prove the hypothesis of "not-so-simple" nephrectomy, we compared demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications between simple and radical nephrectomy in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS:

We analyzed 473 consecutive radical nephrectomies (January 2018-October 2020) and simple nephrectomies (January 2016-October 2020). Univariate and multivariate analysis of perioperative outcomes utilized the Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, Mantel-Haenszel test of trend, and multiple linear regression. Radical nephrectomies were classified in cT1, cT2a, and cT2b-T3 subgroups and compared to simple nephrectomies. Minimally invasive and open techniques were compared between the two groups. Infected versus non-infected simple nephrectomies were compared.

RESULTS:

A total of 344 radical and 129 simple nephrectomies were included. Simple nephrectomy was an independent predictor of increased operative time (p = 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.049), and postoperative complications (p < 0.001). Simple nephrectomies had higher operative time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.014), and postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001) than cT1 radical nephrectomies and significantly more Clavien 1-2 complications than cT2a radical nephrectomies (p = 0.001). The trend was similar in minimally invasive operations. However, conversion to open rates was not significantly different. Infected simple nephrectomies had increased operative time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.005), blood loss (p = 0.016), and intensive care stay (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients undergoing simple nephrectomy experienced increased operative time and morbidity. Simple nephrectomy carries higher morbidity than radical nephrectomy in tumors ≤10 cm. Robotic simple nephrectomies may reduce open conversion rates. Postoperative intensive care and enhanced recovery may be essential in simple nephrectomy planning with infected pathology.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Neoplasias Renais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Neoplasias Renais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article