Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury.

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT The number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were patients with subacute CSCI. INTERVENTIONS: The CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month. OUTCOME MEASURES: The MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor. RESULTS: There were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.