Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of Ex-vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Margin Assessment of Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.
Au, Matthew; Almeida-Magana, Ricardo; Al-Hammouri, Tarek; Haider, Aiman; Shaw, Greg.
Afiliação
  • Au M; Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
  • Almeida-Magana R; Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
  • Al-Hammouri T; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
  • Haider A; Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
  • Shaw G; Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
J Histochem Cytochem ; 71(12): 661-674, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968920
Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a novel technology that enables rapid high-resolution digital imaging of non-formalin-fixed tissue specimens and offers real-time positive surgical margin identification. In this systematic review, we evaluated the accuracy metrics of ex vivo FCM for intraoperative margin assessment of different tumor types. A systematic search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed for relevant papers (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022372558). We included 14 studies evaluating four types of microscopes in six different tumor types, including breast, prostate, central nervous system, kidney, bladder, and conjunctival tumors. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, we identified a high risk of bias in patient selection (21%) and index test (36%) of the included studies. Overall, we found that FCM has good accuracy metrics in all tumor types, with high sensitivity and specificity (>80%) and almost perfect concordance (>90%) against final pathology results. Despite these promising findings, the quality of the available evidence and bias concerns highlight the need for adequately designed studies to further define the role of ex vivo FCM in replacing the frozen section as the tool of choice for intraoperative margin assessment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article