Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication.
Clymo, Jonathon; Courtney, Alona; Carrington, Emma V.
Afiliação
  • Clymo J; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
  • Courtney A; Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, 3rd floor, Charles Bell House, 43-47 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom; The Princess Grace Hospital, HCA Healthcare UK, 42-52 Nottingham Place, London W1U 5NY, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alona.courtney@icloud.com.
  • Carrington EV; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Imperial College London, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, St Mary's Campus, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 113: 109044, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979553
INTRODUCTION: Duplication of the appendix is a very rare presentation. According to the Cave-Wallbridge classification, there are three types of duplicate appendix. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 43 year old female presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis, with unremarkable inflammatory markers. The diagnosis was confirmed on pre-operative computer tomography (CT). During laparoscopy two tubular structures were identified: one arising from the tenia libera of the caecum adjacent to the terminal ileum and one retrocaecally at the confluence of the teniae. Both structures were excised using a laparoscopic linear stapler. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the accessory structure to be a microscopically unremarkable blind-ended tubular structure. The other specimen demonstrated acute gangrenous inflammation of the appendix. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home the following day. DISCUSSION: Appendix duplication is rare; however, failure to recognise it in a patient with acute appendicitis could result in a retained source of sepsis, requiring subsequent re-exploration of the abdomen. The case presented here represents a Type B2 according to the Cave-Wallbridge classification and is the most susceptible to inadvertent error due to having appendixes in both typical and atypical anatomical locations. This case also highlights the probability of this diagnosis being missed on pre-operative CT. CONCLUSION: This case report presents a unique opportunity for surgical trainees to review intra-operative laparoscopic images of a duplicate appendix, both to allow them to recognise this pathology if encountered in the future, and to embed the importance of ruling it out with thorough intra-operative examination.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article