Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of myocardial injury in patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy.
Pereira-Macedo, Juliana; Silva, Ana Filipa; Duarte-Gamas, Luís; Andrade, José Paulo; Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo; Rocha-Neves, João.
Afiliação
  • Pereira-Macedo J; Department of Surgery, Hospitalar Centre of Medio-Ave, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
  • Silva AF; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospitalar Centre of Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal.
  • Duarte-Gamas L; Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Portugal.
  • Andrade JP; Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Portugal.
  • Sousa-Pinto B; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospitalar Centre of Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal.
  • Rocha-Neves J; Department of Biomedicine, Unity of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
Vasa ; 53(1): 13-27, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987782
ABSTRACT
Myocardial injury following noncardiac surgery (MINS) is associated with higher mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event rates in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, its incidence is still unclear in this subset of patients. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aims to determine the incidence of MINS in patients undergoing CEA. Three electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were used to search for studies assessing the occurrence of MINS in the postoperative setting of patients undergoing CEA. The incidence of MINS was pooled by random-effects meta-analysis, with sources of heterogeneity being explored by meta-regression and subgroup analysis (general anesthesia vs. regional anesthesia). Assessment of studies' quality was performed using National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tool, and Risk of Bias 2 tools. Twenty studies were included, with a total of 117,933 participants. Four of them were RCTs, while the remaining were cohort studies. All observational cohorts had an overall high risk of bias, except for Pereira Macedo et al. Three of them had repeated population, thus only data from the most recent one was considered. On the other hand, all RCT had an overall low risk of bias. In patients under regional anesthesia, the incidence of MINS in primary studies ranged between 2% and 15.3%, compared to 0-42.5% for general anesthesia. The meta-analytical incidence of MINS after CEA was of 6.3% [95% CI 2.0-10.6%], but severe heterogeneity was observed (I2=99.1%). MINS appears to be relatively common among patients undergoing CEA. The observed severe heterogeneity points to the need for further larger studies adopting consistent definitions of MINS and equivalent cut-off values.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article