Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial.
Joza, Jacqueline; Nair, Girish M; Birnie, David H; Nery, Pablo B; Redpath, Calum J; Sarrazin, Jean-Francois; Champagne, Jean; Bernick, Jordan; Wells, George A; Essebag, Vidal.
Afiliação
  • Joza J; Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Nair GM; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Birnie DH; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nery PB; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Redpath CJ; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Sarrazin JF; Division of Cardiology, IUCPQ, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Champagne J; Division of Cardiology, IUCPQ, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Bernick J; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wells GA; Divison of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Essebag V; Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(1): 136-145, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990448
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Pulmonary vein isolations (PVI) are being performed using a high-power, short-duration (HPSD) strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of an HPSD versus low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach to PVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS:

Patients were grouped according to a HPSD (≥40 W) or LPLD (≤35 W) strategy. The primary endpoint was the 1-year recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting ≥30 s, detected using three 14-day ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring. Procedural and safety endpoints were also evaluated. The primary analysis were regression models incorporating propensity scores yielding adjusted relative risk (RRa ) and mean difference (MDa ) estimates.

RESULTS:

Of the 398 patients included in the AWARE Trial, 173 (43%) underwent HPSD and 225 (57%) LPLD ablation. The distribution of power was 50 W in 75%, 45 W in 20%, and 40 W in 5% in the HPSD group, and 35 W with 25 W on the posterior wall in the LPLD group. The primary outcome was not statistically significant at 30.1% versus 22.2% in HPSD and LPLD groups with RRa 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.55-1.10; p = .165). The secondary outcome of repeat catheter ablation was not statistically significant at 6.9% and 9.8% (RRa 1.59 [95% CI 0.77-3.30]; p = .208) respectively, nor was the incidence of any ECG documented AF during the blanking period 1.7% versus 8.0% (RRa 3.95 [95% CI 1.00-15.61; p = .049) in the HPSD versus LPLD group respectively. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the HPSD group (MDa 97.5 min [95% CI 84.8-110.4)]; p < .0001) with no difference in adjudicated serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

An HPSD strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedural times with similar efficacy in terms of clinical arrhythmia recurrence. Importantly, there was no signal for increased harm with a HPSD strategy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article