Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities Between Prenatal Ultrasound and Autopsy Findings in Pregnancies Resulting in Fetal Loss.
Kedar Sade, Eliel; Lantsberg, Daniel; Tagar Sar-El, Moriel; Gefen, Sheizaf; Katorza, Eldad.
Afiliação
  • Kedar Sade E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Lantsberg D; The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tagar Sar-El M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gefen S; Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
  • Katorza E; Department of Internal Medicine "E", Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Ultrasound Med ; 43(3): 455-465, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994216
OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to assess disparities between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies that resulted in fetal loss, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound using postmortem examinations as a gold standard. METHODS: Our study included 136 autopsy cases following a fetal loss that occurred at our tertiary medical center for 8 years. A comparison between the prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings was made, and all cases were classified according to the degree of agreement. The diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound was calculated at the level of organ system and specific malformations. RESULTS: The primary sonographic diagnosis was confirmed in 91.9% of the cases (n = 125). General agreement was highest among central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems (85.7%, n = 36, 18, and 12, respectively) and lowest among facial, multiple anomalies, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (50.0%, 74.3%, 78.6%, and 80.0%, n = 2, 26, 11, and 4, respectively). The sensitivity of ultrasound was highest in the CNS (93.2%) and musculoskeletal (87.0%) and lowest in the facial (32.3%) and pulmonary (13.0%) systems. Specifically, low diagnostic rates were noted in detecting ventriculomegaly, valvular anomalies, renal dysplasia, spleen and adrenal anomalies, and digital and facial defects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed an overall high agreement between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy while contributing to our comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations across various types of organ systems and specific malformations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Malformações do Sistema Nervoso Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Malformações do Sistema Nervoso Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article