Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 in the Lifelines cohort study at baseline.
Baart, A Mireille; Brouwer-Brolsma, Elske M; de Jong, Hanne B T; de Vries, Jeanne H M; Feskens, Edith J M.
Afiliação
  • Baart AM; Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands. mireille.baart@wur.nl.
  • Brouwer-Brolsma EM; Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Jong HBT; Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Vries JHM; Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Feskens EJM; Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 78(3): 217-227, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017142
BACKGROUND: Dietary indices are useful measures to investigate associations between dietary intake and disease development. The Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD2015-index), a measure of diet quality, assesses adherence to the 2015 Dutch dietary guidelines. We assessed the DHD2015-index in the Lifelines cohort study, and compared calculations from basic and detailed dietary intake data. This article replaces the retracted article that was published on 16 May 2022 [1]. METHODS: Dietary intake was assessed with a specially developed Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) called Flower-FFQ, which consists of one main questionnaire (heart-FFQ), which asks for intakes of major food groups, and three complementary questionnaires (petal-FFQs), which ask for detailed information on food types within major food groups of the heart-FFQ. The DHD2015-index was assessed using data from the total Flower-FFQ (for 56,982 participants), and using data from the heart-FFQ only (for 129,030 participants). Agreement between the two indices was assessed with correlation and cross-classification. RESULTS: The median (25th-75th percentile) DHD2015-index score was 75 (65-85) for men and 81 (70-91) for women based on the Flower-FFQ, and 68 (58-77) for men and 73 (63-82) for women based on the heart-FFQ. The Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.67 for men and 0.66 for women. Cross-classification into quartiles of the DHD2015-index showed that 59-60% of participants were classified in the same quartile, 36-37% in the adjacent, and 4% in the non-adjacent. CONCLUSION: Dietary data from the Flower-FFQ provide the most optimal information to assess the DHD2015-index. However, the DHD2015-index from the heart-FFQ showed good agreement with the index from the Flower-FFQ of ranking participants according to diet quality, and can be used when the DHD2015 index from the Flower-FFQ is not available.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Dieta Saudável Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Dieta Saudável Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article