Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study.
Switchenko, Nora; Shukla, Vivek; Mwenechanya, Musaku; Chomba, Elwyn; Patel, Archana; Hibberd, Patricia L; Ambalavanan, Namasivayam; Figueroa, Lester; Mazariegos, Manolo; Krebs, Nancy F; Goudar, Shivaprasad S; Derman, Richard; Esamai, Fabian; Liechty, Edward A; Bucher, Sheri; Saleem, Sarah; Goldenberg, Robert L; Lokangaka, Adrien; Tshefu, Antoinette; Bose, Carl L; Koso-Thomas, Marion; Tan, Sylvia; Nolen, Tracy; McClure, Elizabeth M; Carlo, Waldemar A.
Afiliação
  • Switchenko N; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Shukla V; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Mwenechanya M; Department of Pediatrics, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Chomba E; Department of Pediatrics, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Patel A; Lata Medical Research Foundation, India and Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
  • Hibberd PL; Department of Pediatrics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ambalavanan N; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Figueroa L; INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
  • Mazariegos M; INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
  • Krebs NF; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Goudar SS; KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research's J. N. Medical College, Belagavi, India.
  • Derman R; Department of Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Esamai F; Department of Pediatrics, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
  • Liechty EA; Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
  • Bucher S; Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
  • Saleem S; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Goldenberg RL; Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lokangaka A; Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  • Tshefu A; Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  • Bose CL; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Koso-Thomas M; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Tan S; RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Nolen T; RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • McClure EM; RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Carlo WA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Neonatology ; 121(1): 116-124, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048757
BACKGROUND: Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. METHODS: This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. RESULTS: 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido / Recém-Nascido Prematuro Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido / Recém-Nascido Prematuro Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article