Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of copy-number variants in a large cohort of patients with von Willebrand disease reveals a relationship between disrupted regions and disease type.
Sadler, Brooke; Christopherson, Pamela A; Perry, Crystal L; Bellissimo, Daniel B; Haberichter, Sandra L; Haller, Gabe; Antunes, Lilian; Flood, Veronica H; Di Paola, Jorge; Montgomery, Robert R.
Afiliação
  • Sadler B; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Christopherson PA; Versiti Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Perry CL; Versiti Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Bellissimo DB; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Haberichter SL; Versiti Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Haller G; Division of Pediatric Hematology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Antunes L; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Flood VH; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Di Paola J; Versiti Blood Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Montgomery RR; Division of Pediatric Hematology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 7(7): 102232, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38077814
ABSTRACT

Background:

Genetic analysis for von Willebrand disease (VWD) commonly utilizes DNA sequencing to identify variants in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene; however, this technique cannot always detect copy-number variants (CNVs). Additional mapping of CNVs in patients with VWD is needed.

Objectives:

This study aimed to characterize CNVs in a large sample of VWF mutation-negative VWD patients.

Methods:

To determine the role of CNVs in VWD, a VWF high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization array was custom-designed to avoid multiple sequence variations, repeated sequences, and the VWF pseudogene. This was performed on 204 mutation-negative subjects for whom clinical variables were also available.

Results:

Among the 204 patients, 7 unique CNVs were found, with a total of 24 CNVs (12%). Of the 7 unique CNVs, 1 was novel, 1 was found in a VWF database, and 5 were previously reported. All patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV had the same exon 33 and 34 in-frame deletion. Certain clinical variables were also significantly different between those with and without CNVs.

Conclusion:

The in-frame deletion in patients with type 1C VWD exactly matches the D4N module of the D4 domain, a region where mutations and deletions are known to affect clearance. We observed significantly higher VWF-to-ristocetin cofactor levels in patients with type 1C VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting a relationship between CNVs and the increased clearance observed in patients with type 1C VWD. Glycoprotein IbM activity was significantly lower in patients with type 1 VWD and a CNV than in patients without a CNV, suggesting that platelet binding is more affected by CNVs than single base pair mutations. This work elucidates some of the underlying genetic mechanisms of CNVs in these patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article