Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preventative strategies for low anterior resection syndrome.
Brock, H; Lambrineas, L; Ong, H I; Chen, W Y; Das, A; Edsell, A; Proud, D; Carrington, E; Smart, P; Mohan, H; Burgess, A.
Afiliação
  • Brock H; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Lambrineas L; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Ong HI; Western General, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Chen WY; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Das A; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. hwaia3@gmail.com.
  • Edsell A; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. hwaia3@gmail.com.
  • Proud D; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Carrington E; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Smart P; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Mohan H; Austin Health, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Burgess A; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 10, 2023 12 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091118
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A common and debilitating complication of low anterior resection for rectal cancer is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). As a multifactorial entity, LARS is poorly understood and challenging to treat. Despite this, prevention strategies are commonly overlooked. Our aim was to review the pathophysiology of LARS and explore current evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of prophylactic techniques.

METHODS:

A literature review was performed between [1st January 2000 to 1st October 2023] for studies which investigated preventative interventions for LARS. Mechanisms by which LARS develop are described, followed by a review of prophylactic strategies to prevent LARS. Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched, 189 articles screened, 8 duplicates removed and 18 studies reviewed.

RESULTS:

Colonic dysmotility, anal sphincter dysfunction and neorectal dysfunction all contribute to the development of LARS, with the complex mechanism of defecation interrupted by surgery. Transanal irrigation (TAI) and pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) have shown benefits in preventing LARS, but may be limited by patient compliance. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) and robotic-assisted surgery have shown some promise in surgically preventing LARS. Nerve stimulation and other novel strategies currently used in treatment of LARS have yet to be investigated in their roles prophylactically.

CONCLUSIONS:

To date, there is a limited evidence base for all preventative strategies including IONM, RAS, PFP and TAI. These strategies are limited by either access (IONM, RAS and PFP) or acceptability (PFP and TAI), which are both key to the success of any intervention. The results of ongoing trials will serve to assess acceptability, while technological advancement may improve access to some of the aforementioned strategies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article