Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gauging the stress of long-term care nursing assistants using ecological momentary assessment, wearable sensors and end of day reconstruction.
Doran, Kelly; Witmer, Susanna; Yoon, K Lira; Fischer, Ethan Ray; Ebangwese, Abaneh; Sharma, Shifali; Duggirala, G S Charan; Chen, Lujie Karen.
Afiliação
  • Doran K; University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Nursing In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Witmer S; University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Nursing In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Yoon KL; University of Maryland, Baltimore County In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Fischer ER; University of Maryland, Baltimore County In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Ebangwese A; University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Nursing In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Sharma S; University of Maryland, Baltimore County In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Duggirala GSC; University of Maryland, Baltimore County In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Chen LK; University of Maryland, Baltimore County In Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Int J Older People Nurs ; 19(1): e12592, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098142
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nursing assistants working in long-term care (LTC) often report that their job is stressful. To reduce their work stress, a better understanding of their stress profile is needed.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to pilot test methods to identify and understand stressors that LTC nursing assistants experience.

METHODS:

We asked each participant to provide wearable sensor/watch data, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys and end of day review data over two eight-hour working shifts.

RESULTS:

Eight nursing assistants participated. All participants worked in a common continuing care retirement community in Maryland, United States of America. Our stress assessment method revealed 83 stressful events that were classified under 10 categories. Most of the reported events were rated as having a mild to low-moderate intensity. The three most common causes of stress were work demands and pressure (28.35%), heavy workload and staffing (19.69%), and safety issues and COVID-19 concerns (17.32%). We also explored the difference between stress events and intensity among different shifts. Disrespect from residents (22.73%) was the most commonly reported stressor during day shifts. Feeling rushed was the most commonly reported stressor during the evening (22.47%) and the night (38.46%) shifts.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found stress was commonly reported. Stress intensity conflicted with prior literature, and we explored possible explanations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE We discuss potential implications for these findings, modification of our methods to increase feasibility, the utility of these data collection methods for future work and suggest next steps.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Assistentes de Enfermagem Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Assistentes de Enfermagem Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article