Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Evolution of the perception of the safety culture of healthcare professionals in a pediatric emergency department]. / Evolución de la percepción de la cultura de seguridad de los profesionales sanitarios en una urgencia pediátrica.
Collado-González, B; Ferrero-García-Loygorri, C; Escobar-Castellanos, M; Barrera-Brito, V; Salvador-Rodríguez, M; Marañón, R; Mora-Capín, A.
Afiliação
  • Collado-González B; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España. Electronic address: blanca.collado@salud.madrid.org.
  • Ferrero-García-Loygorri C; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
  • Escobar-Castellanos M; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
  • Barrera-Brito V; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
  • Salvador-Rodríguez M; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
  • Marañón R; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
  • Mora-Capín A; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 39(1): 41-49, 2024.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123402
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Safety culture (SC) is a fundamental tool for minimizing adverse events and improving safety and quality of care. Our objective, therefore was to analyze the evolution of the SC of healthcare professionals in a pediatric emergency department (PED) after the implementation of a risk management system for patient safety based on the UNEENISO 179003 Standard and the execution of new safe practices for Joint Commission International accreditation. At the same time describe the current strengths and weaknesses.

METHODS:

Quasi-experimental, single-center study. All PED professionals participated in the study. An initial measurement of SC was performed through the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) questionnaire of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish in 2014. Pro-patient safety strategies were implemented between 2015 and 2022. A subsequent measurement was performed in 2022.

RESULTS:

The response rate in 2014 was 55% and 78% in 2022. On both occasions the group with the highest participation was nurses with 35.1% and 34.8%, respectively. Five dimensions improved after the

interventions:

frequency of adverse events (25.2%, p<0.001), organizational learning (25%, p<0.001), feedback and communication about errors (22.3%, p<0.001), non-punitive response to errors (6.5%, p = 0.176), and management support (4%, p = 0.333).

CONCLUSIONS:

The actions carried out had a positive influence on organizational learning and the frequency of adverse events reported and communication within the team. In contrast, the perception of SC did not increase.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Gestão da Segurança Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Gestão da Segurança Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article