Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of an integrated practice unit for vulnerable emergency department patients.
Borde, Deepa; Agana-Norman, Denny Fe G; Leverence, Robert; Photos, Lorrie; Shuster, Jon; Lukose, Kiran; Pinkney, Jacqueline; Wright, Joy; Waxenberg, Lori; Allen, Brandon; Radhakrishnan, Nila S.
Afiliação
  • Borde D; University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Agana-Norman DFG; University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
  • Leverence R; University of Texas Health, 703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
  • Photos L; University of Florida Health, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Shuster J; University of Florida Health, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Lukose K; University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Pinkney J; University of Florida Health, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Wright J; University of Florida Health, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Waxenberg L; University of Florida Health, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Allen B; University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
  • Radhakrishnan NS; University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA. Radhakrishnan@ufl.edu.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 1449, 2023 Dec 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38129783
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An integrated practice unit (IPU) that provides a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, typically involving a primary care provider, registered nurse, social worker, and pharmacist has been shown to reduce healthcare utilization among high-cost super-utilizer (SU) patients or multi-visit patients (MVP). However, less is known about differences in the impact of these interventions on insured vs. uninsured SU patients and super high frequency SUs ([Formula see text]8 ED visits per 6 months) vs. high frequency SUs (4-7 ED visits per 6 months).

METHODS:

We assessed the percent reduction in ED visits, ED cost, hospitalizations, hospital days, and hospitalization costs following implementation of an IPU for SUs located in an academic tertiary care facility. We compared outcomes for publicly insured with uninsured patients, and super high frequency SUs with high frequency SUs 6 months before vs. 6 months after enrollment in the IPU.

RESULTS:

There was an overall 25% reduction in hospitalizations (p < 0.001), and 23% reduction in hospital days (p = 0.0045), when comparing 6 months before vs. 6 months after enrollment in the program. There was a 26% reduction in average total direct hospitalization costs per patient (p = 0.002). Further analysis revealed a greater reduction in health care utilization for uninsured SU patients compared with publicly insured patients. The program reduced hospitalizations for super high frequency SUs. However, there was no statistically significant impact on overall health care utilization of super high frequency SUs when compared with high frequency SUs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study supports existing evidence that dedicated IPUs for SUs can achieve significant reductions in acute care utilization, particularly for uninsured and high frequency SU patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION IRB201500212. Retrospectively registered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hospitalização Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hospitalização Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article