Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review and integrated analysis with glial fibrillary acidic protein.
Kim, Sohyeon; Lee, Jae-Joon; Park, Jin-Sung; Kang, Minsung; Seok, Hung Youl.
Afiliação
  • Kim S; Department of Neurology, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JJ; Department of Neurology, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JS; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang M; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Seok HY; Department of Neurology, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea. shy2354@gmail.com.
Neurol Sci ; 45(3): 1255-1261, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141119
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the context of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), there are several measures that serve as a biomarker. However, each of the methods has the intrinsic limitations. While neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have emerged as an additional biomarker for NMOSD, a thorough investigation of their role remains incomplete. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature regarding NfL and GFAP as a biomarker and explore their potential utility in NMOSD.

METHODS:

We performed a comprehensive search using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles investigating NfL and GFAP as a biomarker in NMOSD.

RESULTS:

Our search identified 13 relevant studies. NfL consistently showed promise in distinguishing NMOSD patients from healthy individuals, although it had limited specificity in distinguishing NMOSD from other demyelinating diseases. NfL offered certain advantages over GFAP, notably its ability to predict disability worsening during attacks. In contrast, GFAP provided valuable insight, particularly in distinguishing NMOSD from multiple sclerosis and identifying clinical relapses. In addition, GFAP showed predictive potential for future attacks. Some studies even suggested that NfL may serve as an indicator of treatment response in NMOSD.

CONCLUSIONS:

NfL and GFAP hold promise as biomarkers for NMOSD, demonstrating their usefulness in distinguishing patients from healthy individuals, assessing disease severity, and possibly reflecting treatment response. However, it is important to recognize that NfL and GFAP may, at some point, have different roles.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neuromielite Óptica / Esclerose Múltipla Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neuromielite Óptica / Esclerose Múltipla Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article