Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eye Size and Shape in Relation to Refractive Error in Children: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
Kneepkens, Sander C M; Marstal, Kasper; Polling, Jan-Roelof; Jaddoe, Vincent W V; Vernooij, Meike W; Poot, Dirk H J; Klaver, Caroline C W; Tideman, J Willem L.
Afiliação
  • Kneepkens SCM; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Marstal K; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Polling JR; The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jaddoe VWV; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vernooij MW; Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Poot DHJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Klaver CCW; Department of Orthoptics, School of Applied Science Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Tideman JWL; The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 64(15): 41, 2023 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153751
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between eye shape and volume measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical biometry and with spherical equivalent (SE) in children.

Methods:

For this study, there were 3637 10-year-old children from a population-based birth-cohort study that underwent optical biometry (IOL-master 500) and T2-weighted MRI scanning (height, width, and volume). Cycloplegic refractive error was determined by automated refraction. The MRI images of the eyes were segmented using an automated algorithm combining atlas registration with voxel classification. Associations among optical biometry, anthropometry, MRI measurements, and RE were tested using Pearson correlation. Differences between refractive error groups were tested using ANOVA.

Results:

The mean volume of the posterior segment was 6350 (±680) mm3. Myopic eyes (SE ≤ -0.5 diopters [D]) had 470 mm3 (P < 0.001) and 970 mm3 (P < 0.001) larger posterior segment volume than emmetropic and hyperopic eyes (SE ≥ +2.0D), respectively. The majority of eyes (77.1%) had an oblate shape, but 47.4% of myopic eyes had a prolate shape versus 3.9% of hyperopic eyes. The correlation between SE and MRI-derived posterior segment length (r -0.51, P < 0.001) was stronger than the correlation with height (r -0.30, P < 0.001) or width of the eye (r -0.10, P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

In this study, eye shape at 10 years of age was predominantly oblate, even in eyes with myopia. Of all MRI measurements, posterior segment length was most prominently associated with SE. Whether eye shape predicts future myopia development or progression should be investigated in longitudinal studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Hiperopia / Miopia Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Hiperopia / Miopia Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article