Long-Term Outcomes of Infantile Sacrococcygeal Teratoma: Results from a Multi-Institutional Retrospective Observational Study in Japan.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tumor recurrence, anorectal and urinary dysfunction, and lower limb dysfunction after surgery are observed in infantile sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). In this paper, a multi-institutional retrospective observational study was conducted to clarify the long-term functional prognosis in Japan. METHODS: This study was conducted using a paper-based questionnaire distributed to 192 facilities accredited by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons, covering patients who underwent radical surgery at less than 1 year old and who survived for at least 180 days after birth from 2000 to 2019. RESULTS: A total of 355 patients were included in this analysis. Altman type was I-II in 248 and type III-IV in 107, and the median maximum tumor diameter was 6.1 (range 0.6-36.0) cm. There were 269 mature teratomas, 69 immature teratomas, and 10 malignant tumors. Total resection was performed in 325, subtotal or partial resection in 27, and surgical complications were noted in 54. The median postoperative follow-up was 6.6 (0.5-21.7) years. Eighty-three patients (23.4 %) had functional sequelae, including 62 (17.5 %) with anorectal dysfunction, 56 (13.0 %) with urinary dysfunction, and 15 (4.2 %) with lower limb motor dysfunction. Recurrence occurred in 42 (11.8 %) at a median age of 16.8 (1.7-145.1) months old. Risk factors for dysfunction included preterm delivery, a large tumor diameter, Altman type III-IV, incomplete resection, and surgical complications. Risk factors for recurrence included immature teratoma or malignancy, incomplete resection, and surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative dysfunction was not low at 23.4 %, and 11.8 % of the patients experienced recurrence occurring more than 10 years after surgery, suggesting the need for periodic imaging and tumor markers evaluations in patients with risk factors. It is necessary to establish treatment guidelines for best practice monitoring of the long-term quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II Retrospective Study.