Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison between endoscopic and microscopic approaches for stapes surgery: experience of a tertiary referral center.
Sacchetto, L; Raguso, G; Confuorto, G; Arietti, V; Torroni, L; Marchioni, D; Nocini, R.
Afiliação
  • Sacchetto L; Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
  • Raguso G; Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
  • Confuorto G; Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
  • Arietti V; Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. valerio.arietti@gmail.com.
  • Torroni L; Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Marchioni D; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
  • Nocini R; Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(6): 2959-2965, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38158420
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Otosclerosis is a common ear disease causing ankylosis of the stapedio-vestibular joint and conductive hearing loss. Stapedoplasty is the most advisable surgical solution. The restoration of hearing depends on the condition of the patient and the surgery itself. The aim of our work was to compare the surgical and audiological results of stapedoplasty performed with endoscopic versus microscopic technique.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of 254 patients treated with stapedoplasty with a microscopic approach (91/254) or with an endoscopic approach (163/254) between 2014 and 2021 at our tertiary referral center. Statistical significance of differences between the two methods was determined using the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables and the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for repeated measures. Categorical variables were assessed with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS:

Both techniques improved the hearing status of patients, with no statistically significant difference between them. There was also no statistically significant difference in reported complications between the two techniques. There is a statistical difference (p < 0.001) in operating time between the two techniques the endoscopic technique had a mean operating time of 39 min versus 45 min for the microscopic technique.

CONCLUSIONS:

The two techniques are comparable in terms of results and the choice depends on the surgeon's preferences and experience.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otosclerose / Cirurgia do Estribo / Endoscopia / Centros de Atenção Terciária / Microcirurgia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otosclerose / Cirurgia do Estribo / Endoscopia / Centros de Atenção Terciária / Microcirurgia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article