Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incorporating high-resolution climate, remote sensing and topographic data to map annual forest growth in central and eastern Europe.
Jevsenak, Jernej; Klisz, Marcin; Masek, Jirí; Cada, Vojtech; Janda, Pavel; Svoboda, Miroslav; Vostarek, Ondrej; Treml, Vaclav; van der Maaten, Ernst; Popa, Andrei; Popa, Ionel; van der Maaten-Theunissen, Marieke; Zlatanov, Tzvetan; Scharnweber, Tobias; Ahlgrimm, Svenja; Stolz, Juliane; Sochová, Irena; Roibu, Catalin-Constantin; Pretzsch, Hans; Schmied, Gerhard; Uhl, Enno; Kaczka, Ryszard; Wrzesinski, Piotr; Senfeldr, Martin; Jakubowski, Marcin; Tumajer, Jan; Wilmking, Martin; Obojes, Nikolaus; Rybnícek, Michal; Lévesque, Mathieu; Potapov, Aleksei; Basu, Soham; Stojanovic, Marko; Stjepanovic, Stefan; Vitas, Adomas; Arnic, Domen; Metslaid, Sandra; Neycken, Anna; Prislan, Peter; Hartl, Claudia; Ziche, Daniel; Horácek, Petr; Krejza, Jan; Mikhailov, Sergei; Svetlík, Jan; Kalisty, Aleksandra; Kolár, Tomás; Lavnyy, Vasyl; Hordo, Maris; Oberhuber, Walter.
Afiliação
  • Jevsenak J; TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Department for Forest and Landscape Planning and Monitoring, Slovenian Forestry Institute, Slovenia. Electronic address: jernej.jevsenak@gozdis.si.
  • Klisz M; Dendrolab IBL, Department of Silviculture and Forest Tree Genetics, Forest Research Institute, Poland.
  • Masek J; Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
  • Cada V; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Janda P; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Svoboda M; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Vostarek O; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Treml V; Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
  • van der Maaten E; Chair of Forest Growth and Woody Biomass Production, TU Dresden, Germany.
  • Popa A; National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea", Romania; Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.
  • Popa I; National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea", Romania.
  • van der Maaten-Theunissen M; Chair of Forest Growth and Woody Biomass Production, TU Dresden, Germany.
  • Zlatanov T; Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.
  • Scharnweber T; DendroGreif, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Germany.
  • Ahlgrimm S; DendroGreif, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Germany.
  • Stolz J; Chair of Forest Growth and Woody Biomass Production, TU Dresden, Germany; Department of Forest Planning/Forest Research/Information Systems, Research Unit Silviculture and Forest Growth, Landesforst Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
  • Sochová I; Department of Wood Science and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Roibu CC; Forest Biometrics Laboratory, Faculty of Forestry, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania.
  • Pretzsch H; TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
  • Schmied G; TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
  • Uhl E; TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Germany.
  • Kaczka R; Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
  • Wrzesinski P; Dendrolab IBL, Department of Silviculture and Forest Tree Genetics, Forest Research Institute, Poland.
  • Senfeldr M; Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Jakubowski M; Department of Forest Utilisation, Faculty of Forest and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland.
  • Tumajer J; Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic.
  • Wilmking M; DendroGreif, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Germany.
  • Obojes N; Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Italy.
  • Rybnícek M; Department of Wood Science and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Lévesque M; Silviculture Group, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Potapov A; Chair of Forest and Land Management and Wood Processing Technologies, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia.
  • Basu S; Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Stojanovic M; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Stjepanovic S; Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • Vitas A; Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania.
  • Arnic D; Department for Forest Technique and Economics, Slovenian Forestry Institute, Slovenia.
  • Metslaid S; Chair of Forest and Land Management and Wood Processing Technologies, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia.
  • Neycken A; Silviculture Group, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Prislan P; Department for Forest Technique and Economics, Slovenian Forestry Institute, Slovenia.
  • Hartl C; Nature Rings - Environmental Research and Education, Germany; Panel on Planetary Thinking, Justus-Liebig-University, Germany.
  • Ziche D; Faculty of Forest and Environment, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Germany.
  • Horácek P; Department of Wood Science and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Krejza J; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic; Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Mikhailov S; Department of Wood Science and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Svetlík J; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic; Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Kalisty A; Faculty of Forestry, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland.
  • Kolár T; Department of Wood Science and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic; Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic.
  • Lavnyy V; Department of Silviculture, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Ukraine.
  • Hordo M; Chair of Forest and Land Management and Wood Processing Technologies, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia.
  • Oberhuber W; Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Sci Total Environ ; 913: 169692, 2024 Feb 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160816
ABSTRACT
To enhance our understanding of forest carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation and drought impact on forest ecosystems, the availability of high-resolution annual forest growth maps based on tree-ring width (TRW) would provide a significant advancement to the field. Site-specific characteristics, which can be approximated by high-resolution Earth observation by satellites (EOS), emerge as crucial drivers of forest growth, influencing how climate translates into tree growth. EOS provides information on surface reflectance related to forest characteristics and thus can potentially improve the accuracy of forest growth models based on TRW. Through the modelling of TRW using EOS, climate and topography data, we showed that species-specific models can explain up to 52 % of model variance (Quercus petraea), while combining different species results in relatively poor model performance (R2 = 13 %). The integration of EOS into models based solely on climate and elevation data improved the explained variance by 6 % on average. Leveraging these insights, we successfully generated a map of annual TRW for the year 2021. We employed the area of applicability (AOA) approach to delineate the range in which our models are deemed valid. The calculated AOA for the established forest-type models was 73 % of the study region, indicating robust spatial applicability. Notably, unreliable predictions predominantly occurred in the climate margins of our dataset. In conclusion, our large-scale assessment underscores the efficacy of combining climate, EOS and topographic data to develop robust models for mapping annual TRW. This research not only fills a critical void in the current understanding of forest growth dynamics but also highlights the potential of integrated data sources for comprehensive ecosystem assessments.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article