Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual Rehabilitation and COVID-19: Varied Adoption and Satisfaction Among Patients and Providers Participating in a Multi-Site Survey Study.
Manes, Mindi R; Burnfield, Judith M; Boersma, Kelsey; Peoples, Jason; Davis, Anita; Beneciuk, Jason M; Bialosky, Joel; Jordan, Katelyn; Osborne, Raine.
Afiliação
  • Manes MR; Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Center for Research Analytics and Outcomes, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Burnfield JM; Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals, Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  • Boersma K; Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • Peoples J; Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • Davis A; Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Clinical Research Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Beneciuk JM; Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Clinical Research Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Bialosky J; University of Florida, Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Jordan K; Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Clinical Research Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Osborne R; University of Florida, Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580231222334, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166514
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic compelled rapid healthcare adaptations including increased use of telehealth (TH) and virtual care (VC) to provide rehabilitation services. This multi-site cross-sectional survey study examined rehabilitation patients' and providers' experiences with service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of TH/VC. Patients and providers who received or provided rehabilitation services were recruited from 1 of 3 large, post-acute rehabilitation systems located in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants rated personal satisfaction with rehabilitation services received or rendered during the pandemic and willingness to use TH/VC in the future. Questions also addressed accessibility, ease of use, and perceived barriers to TH/VC use. The adoption and personal satisfaction of TH/VC for rehabilitation care varied between patients and providers. Patients reported higher levels of satisfaction compared to providers (P < .001). Patients who did not use TH/VC had higher satisfaction than those who did (P < .05). Patients were less willing than providers to use TH/VC (P < .001). Those who used TH/VC prior to the pandemic were more willing to use post-pandemic (P < .001). Patients reported TH/VC was useful in increasing health services accessibility yet were neutral as to the ability of TH/VC to improve outcomes. Patients and providers agreed that TH/VC was easy to learn and use. Medical providers found TH/VC more useful than therapy providers. Participants who used TH/VC during the pandemic are more willing to use the service again in the future. Understanding patient and provider preferences and perspectives is key to the continued use of TH/VC in rehabilitation care.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Telerreabilitação / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Telerreabilitação / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article