Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The prevalence and severity of loneliness and deficits in perceived social support among who have received a 'personality disorder' diagnosis or have relevant traits: a systematic review.
Ikhtabi, Sarah; Pitman, Alexandra; Maconick, Lucy; Pearce, Eiluned; Dale, Oliver; Rowe, Sarah; Johnson, Sonia.
Afiliação
  • Ikhtabi S; UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK. sarah.ikhtabi.19@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Pitman A; UCL Division of Psychiatry, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Maconick L; UCL Division of Psychiatry, NIHR Doctoral Research Fellow, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Pearce E; UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
  • Dale O; Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Rowe S; UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
  • Johnson S; UCL Division of Psychiatry, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 21, 2024 01 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172738
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Loneliness and struggles with unmet social needs are a common experience among people with 'personality disorder' diagnoses/traits. Given the impact of loneliness and poor perceived social support on mental health, and the importance of a sense of belonging for recovery, a systematic review examining the prevalence/severity of loneliness and deficits in perceived social support among people with 'personality disorder' diagnoses/traits is an essential step towards developing an intervention targeting the social needs of people with diagnoses/traits 'personality disorder'. Despite an extensive literature on loneliness and deficits of perceived social support among people with 'personality disorder' diagnosis/traits, to date there has been no systematic review of this evidence.

METHOD:

We conducted a systematic review synthesising quantitative data on the prevalence/severity of loneliness and deficits of perceived social support among people with diagnoses/traits of 'personality disorder' in comparison with other clinical groups and the general population. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Social Science, Google scholar and Ethos British Library from inception to December 2021. We conducted quality appraisals using the Joanna Briggs Critical appraisal tools and rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A narrative synthesis was used describing the direction and strength of associations prioritising high quality studies.

FINDINGS:

A final set of 70 studies are included in this review, most of which are cross-sectional studies (n = 55), based in the United States (51%) and focused on community samples. Our synthesis of evidence found that, across all types of 'personality disorders' (except 'narcissistic personality' traits), people with traits associated with 'personality disorder' or meeting criteria for a diagnosis of 'personality disorder', have higher levels of loneliness, lower perceived relationship satisfaction, and poorer social support than the general population or other clinical samples.

CONCLUSION:

The quality of evidence is judged as low quality. However, given the distressing nature of loneliness and the known negative effects of loneliness on mental health and recovery, it is important for future research to explore mechanisms by which loneliness may exacerbate 'personality disorder' symptoms and the impact this has on recovery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Personalidade / Solidão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Personalidade / Solidão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article