Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review and meta-analysis of early aortic valve replacement versus conservative therapy in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis with preserved left ventricle systolic function.
Senguttuvan, Nagendra Boopathy; Srinivasan, Nishok Victory; Panchanatham, Manokar; Abdulkader, Rizwan Suliankatchi; Anandaram, Asuwin; Polareddy, Dinesh Reddy; Ramesh, Sankaran; Singh, Harsimran; Yallanki, Hanumath; Kaliyamoorthi, Dhamodaran; Chidambaram, Sundar; Ramalingam, Vadivelu; Rajendran, Ravindran; Muralidharan, Thoddi Ramamurthy; Rao, Ravindar; Seth, Ashok; Claessen, Bimmer; Krishnamoorthy, Parasuram.
Afiliação
  • Senguttuvan NB; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India drsnboopathy@gmail.com.
  • Srinivasan NV; Department of Clinical Research, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Panchanatham M; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Abdulkader RS; Department of Statistics, National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Anandaram A; Department of Clinical Research, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Polareddy DR; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Ramesh S; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Singh H; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Yallanki H; Department of Medicine, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Kaliyamoorthi D; Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Chidambaram S; Department of Cardiology, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, India.
  • Ramalingam V; Department of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Rajendran R; Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Muralidharan TR; Department of Cardiology, SRIHER (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Rao R; Department of Cardiology, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Seth A; Department of Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
  • Claessen B; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Krishnamoorthy P; Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Zena and Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 Jan 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191233
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A quarter of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) were asymptomatic, and only a third of them survived at the end of 4 years. Only a select subset of these patients was recommended for aortic valve replacement (AVR) by the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. We intended to study the effect of early AVR (eAVR) in this subset of asymptomatic patients with preserved left ventricle function. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

We searched PubMed and Embase for randomised and observational studies comparing the effect of eAVR versus conservative therapy in patients with severe, asymptomatic AS and normal left ventricular function. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (study defined), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death, sudden death, the development of symptoms, heart failure hospitalisations and major bleeding. We used GRADEPro to assess the certainty of the evidence. In the randomised controlled trial (RCT) only analysis, we found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the early aortic intervention group versus the conservative arm (CA) (incidence rate ratio, IRR (CI) 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1), I2=31%, p=0.09). However, in the overall cohort, we found mortality benefit for eAVR over CA (IRR (CI) 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7), I2=84%, p<0.01). There were significantly lower MACE, cardiac death, sudden death, development of symptoms and heart failure hospitalisations in the eAVR group. We noticed no difference in MI, stroke and major bleeding.

CONCLUSION:

We conclude that there is no reduction in all-cause mortality in the eAVR arm in patients with asymptomatic AS with preserved ejection fraction. However, eAVR reduces heart failure related hospitalisations and death or heart failure hospitalisations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022306132.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article