Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography.
Nassar, Joyce; Rizk, Chadia; Fares, Georges; Tohme, Carla; Braidy, Chady; Farah, Jad.
Afiliação
  • Nassar J; Faculty of Sciences, Saint-Joseph University, PO Box 11-514, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2050, Lebanon.
  • Rizk C; Faculty of Sciences, Saint-Joseph University, PO Box 11-514, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2050, Lebanon.
  • Fares G; Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission, National Council for Scientific Research, 11-8281 Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Tohme C; Faculty of Sciences, Saint-Joseph University, PO Box 11-514, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2050, Lebanon.
  • Braidy C; Radiology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, PO Box 166830, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Farah J; Radiology Department, Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, PO Box 166830, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(1)2024 Jan 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194904
ABSTRACT
This study aims to assess the image quality (IQ) of 12 mammographic units and to identify units with potential optimisation needs. Data for 350 mammography examinations meeting inclusion criteria were collected retrospectively from April 2021 to April 2022. They were categorised based on the medical reports into 10 normal cases, 10 cases displaying calcifications and 10 cases presenting lesions. Two radiologists assessed the IQ of 1400 mammograms, evaluating system performance per Boitaet al's study and positioning performance following European guidelines. To measure agreement between the two radiologists, the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ) was computed, quantifying the excess of agreement beyond chance. The visual grading analysis score (VGAS) was computed to compare system and positioning performance assessments across different categories and facilities. Median average glandular dose (AGD) values for cranio caudal and medio lateral oblique views were calculated for each category and facility and compared to the national diagnostic reference levels. The health facilities were categorised by considering both IQ VGAS and AGD levels. Inter-rater agreement between radiologists ranged from poor (κ< 0.20) to moderate (0.41 <κ< 0.60), likely influenced by inherent biases and distinct IQ expectations. 50% of the facilities were classified as needing corrective actions for their system performance as they had IQ or high AGD that could increase recall rate and radiation risk and 50% of the health facilities exhibited insufficient positioning performance that could mask tumour masses and microcalcifications. The study's findings emphasise the importance of implementing quality assurance programs to ensure optimal IQ for accurate diagnoses while adhering to radiation exposure guidelines. Additionally, comprehensive training for technologists is essential to address positioning challenges. These initiatives collectively aim to enhance the overall quality of breast imaging services, contributing to improved patient care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Exposição à Radiação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Exposição à Radiação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article