Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Genomic Predictions in Korean Hanwoo Cows: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic BLUP and Bayesian Methods for Reproductive Traits.
Haque, Md Azizul; Lee, Yun-Mi; Ha, Jae-Jung; Jin, Shil; Park, Byoungho; Kim, Nam-Young; Won, Jeong-Il; Kim, Jong-Joo.
Afiliação
  • Haque MA; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YM; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.
  • Ha JJ; Gyeongbuk Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju 36052, Republic of Korea.
  • Jin S; Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Pyeongchang 25340, Republic of Korea.
  • Park B; Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Pyeongchang 25340, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim NY; Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Pyeongchang 25340, Republic of Korea.
  • Won JI; Hanwoo Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Pyeongchang 25340, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JJ; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.
Animals (Basel) ; 14(1)2023 Dec 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38200758
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to predict the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for reproductive traits in Hanwoo cows using the GBLUP, BayesB, BayesLASSO, and BayesR methods. Accuracy estimates of GEBVs for reproductive traits were derived through fivefold cross-validation, analyzing a dataset comprising 11,348 animals and employing an Illumina Bovine 50K SNP chip. GBLUP showed an accuracy of 0.26 for AFC, while BayesB, BayesLASSO, and BayesR demonstrated values of 0.28, 0.29, and 0.29, respectively. For CI, GBLUP attained an accuracy of 0.19, whereas BayesB, BayesLASSO, and BayesR scored 0.21, 0.24, and 0.25, respectively. The accuracy for GL was uniform across GBLUP, BayesB, and BayesR at 0.31, whereas BayesLASSO showed a slightly higher accuracy of 0.33. For NAIPC, GBLUP showed an accuracy of 0.24, while BayesB, BayesLASSO, and BayesR recorded 0.22, 0.27, and 0.30, respectively. The variation in genomic prediction accuracy among methods indicated Bayesian approaches slightly outperformed GBLUP. The findings suggest that Bayesian methods, notably BayesLASSO and BayesR, offer improved predictive capabilities for reproductive traits. Future research may explore more advanced genomic approaches to enhance predictive accuracy and genetic gains in Hanwoo cattle breeding programs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article