Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating a Periapical Lesion Detection CNN on a Clinically Representative CBCT Dataset-A Validation Study.
Hadzic, Arnela; Urschler, Martin; Press, Jan-Niclas Aaron; Riedl, Regina; Rugani, Petra; Stern, Darko; Kirnbauer, Barbara.
Afiliação
  • Hadzic A; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
  • Urschler M; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
  • Press JA; Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
  • Riedl R; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
  • Rugani P; Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
  • Stern D; Institute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
  • Kirnbauer B; Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
J Clin Med ; 13(1)2023 Dec 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38202204
ABSTRACT
The aim of this validation study was to comprehensively evaluate the performance and generalization capability of a deep learning-based periapical lesion detection algorithm on a clinically representative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset and test for non-inferiority. The evaluation involved 195 CBCT images of adult upper and lower jaws, where sensitivity and specificity metrics were calculated for all teeth, stratified by jaw, and stratified by tooth type. Furthermore, each lesion was assigned a periapical index score based on its size to enable a score-based evaluation. Non-inferiority tests were conducted with proportions of 90% for sensitivity and 82% for specificity. The algorithm achieved an overall sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 84.3%. The non-inferiority test indicated the rejection of the null hypothesis for specificity but not for sensitivity. However, when excluding lesions with a periapical index score of one (i.e., very small lesions), the sensitivity improved to 90.4%. Despite the challenges posed by the dataset, the algorithm demonstrated promising results. Nevertheless, further improvements are needed to enhance the algorithm's robustness, particularly in detecting very small lesions and the handling of artifacts and outliers commonly encountered in real-world clinical scenarios.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article