Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Rapid and Safe Minimally Invasive Procedure for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Removal: A Case-Control Study and Technical Description.
Ding, Yan; Wang, Banqin; Liu, Yongjun; Dong, Shengjie; Sun, Xuri; Cao, Zhilin; Wang, Leisheng.
Afiliação
  • Ding Y; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang B; Department of Blood Transfusion, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
  • Dong S; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
  • Sun X; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
  • Cao Z; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang L; Department of Orthopedics, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res ; 17: 219-226, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38226072
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a common minimally invasive treatment for traumatic thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures; however, research on hardware removal after successful healing is limited. We aimed to introduce a rapid, safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective method for percutaneous pedicle screw removal. Patients and

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective analysis of demographic (age, sex, body mass index, alcohol use, and current smoking), clinical (hypertension and diabetes mellitus), surgical (affected levels, number of screws, time of surgery, and blood loss), and treatment cost characteristics of 92 patients who had undergone percutaneous pedicle screw removal between May 2016 and February 2023. The first 57 patients underwent the conventional method, and the remaining 35 underwent the modified method. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively, between the two groups.

Results:

No significant differences were observed in the demographic parameters, complications, or affected levels between the groups. However, the average surgical time (P=0.000) was significantly shorter, and the average blood loss volume (P=0.002) and total cost (P=0.000) were significantly lower in the modified group than in the conventional group.

Conclusion:

Compared with the conventional method, our modified method can shorten the surgical time, reduce blood loss, and reduce the total cost of treatment. It is a quick and safe minimally invasive method that does not require additional surgical instruments and is suitable for implementation in primary hospitals.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article