Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current use and future perspectives of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM): a survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
Schiaffino, Simone; Cozzi, Andrea; Clauser, Paola; Giannotti, Elisabetta; Marino, Maria Adele; van Nijnatten, Thiemo J A; Baltzer, Pascal A T; Lobbes, Marc B I; Mann, Ritse M; Pinker, Katja; Fuchsjäger, Michael H; Pijnappel, Ruud M.
Afiliação
  • Schiaffino S; Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland. simone.schiaffino@eoc.ch.
  • Cozzi A; Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Clauser P; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Giannotti E; Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Marino MA; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, Università degli Studi di Messina, Messina, Italy.
  • van Nijnatten TJA; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Baltzer PAT; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Lobbes MBI; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Mann RM; Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
  • Pinker K; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Fuchsjäger MH; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pijnappel RM; Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Radiol ; 34(8): 5439-5450, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227202
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To perform a survey among members of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) regarding the use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM).

METHODS:

A panel of nine board-certified radiologists developed a 29-item online questionnaire, distributed to all EUSOBI members (inside and outside Europe) from January 25 to March 10, 2023. CEM implementation, examination protocols, reporting strategies, and current and future CEM indications were investigated. Replies were exploratively analyzed with descriptive and non-parametric statistics.

RESULTS:

Among 434 respondents (74.9% from Europe), 50% (217/434) declared to use CEM, 155/217 (71.4%) seeing less than 200 CEMs per year. CEM use was associated with academic settings and high breast imaging workload (p < 0.001). The lack of CEM adoption was most commonly due to the perceived absence of a clinical need (65.0%) and the lack of resources to acquire CEM-capable systems (37.3%). CEM protocols varied widely, but most respondents (61.3%) had already adopted the 2022 ACR CEM BI-RADS® lexicon. CEM use in patients with contraindications to MRI was the most common current indication (80.6%), followed by preoperative staging (68.7%). Patients with MRI contraindications also represented the most commonly foreseen CEM indication (88.0%), followed by the work-up of inconclusive findings at non-contrast examinations (61.5%) and supplemental imaging in dense breasts (53.0%). Respondents declaring CEM use and higher CEM experience gave significantly more current (p = 0.004) and future indications (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite a trend towards academic high-workload settings and its prevalent use in patients with MRI contraindications, CEM use and progressive experience were associated with increased confidence in the technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT In this first survey on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) use and perspectives among the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) members, the perceived absence of a clinical need chiefly drove the 50% CEM adoption rate. CEM adoption and progressive experience were associated with more extended current and future indications. KEY POINTS • Among the 434 members of the European Society of Breast Imaging who completed this survey, 50% declared to use contrast-enhanced mammography in clinical practice. • Due to the perceived absence of a clinical need, contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is still prevalently used as a replacement for MRI in patients with MRI contraindications. • The number of current and future CEM indications marked by respondents was associated with their degree of CEM experience.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article