Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian (prehospital) trauma care: A Delphi study.
van de Voort, Jan C; Kessel, Boris; Borger van der Burg, Boudewijn L S; DuBose, Joseph J; Hörer, Tal M; Hoencamp, Rigo.
Afiliação
  • van de Voort JC; From the Department of Surgery (J.C.vdV., B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery (J.C.vdV., R.H.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Division of General Surgery and Trauma (B.K.), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine (B.K.), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Defense Healthcare Organization (B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, The Netherlan
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(6): 921-930, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227678
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could prevent lethal exsanguination and support cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In prehospital trauma and medical emergency settings, a small population with high mortality rates could potentially benefit from early REBOA deployment. However, its use in these situations remains highly disputed. Since publication of the first Delphi study on REBOA, in which consensus was not reached on all addressed topics, new literature has emerged. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on the use and implementation of REBOA in civilian prehospital settings for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as well as for various in-hospital settings.

METHODS:

A Delphi study consisting of three rounds of questionnaires was conducted based on a review of recent literature. REBOA experts with different medical specialties, backgrounds, and work environments were invited for the international panel. Consensus was reached when a minimum of 75% of panelists responded to a question and at least 75% (positive) or less than 25% (negative) of these respondents agreed on the questioned subject.

RESULTS:

Panel members reached consensus on potential (contra)indications, physiological thresholds for patient selection, the use of ultrasound and practical, and technical aspects for early femoral artery access and prehospital REBOA.

CONCLUSION:

The international expert panel agreed that REBOA can be used in civilian prehospital settings for temporary control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage, provided that personnel are properly trained and protocols are established. For prehospital REBOA and early femoral artery access, consensus was reached on (contra)indications, physiological thresholds and practical aspects. The panel recommends the initiation of a randomized clinical trial investigating the use of prehospital REBOA for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Ressuscitação / Técnica Delphi / Oclusão com Balão / Consenso / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Ressuscitação / Técnica Delphi / Oclusão com Balão / Consenso / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article