Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
EARLY IMPLANT OUTCOMES IN ADULTS WITH DENTAL DECAY TREATED WITH PHOTODYNAMIC TREATMENT.
Kumar, Sh; Yadav, S; Patel, K; Jyothi, R; Kumar, B; Patidar, V.
Afiliação
  • Kumar S; 1Department of prosthodontics and crown & bridge, TMDC & RC, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Yadav S; 2Department of Pharmacy, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Patel K; 3Department of Gynaecology, Parul University, PO Limda, Tal. Waghodia, District Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
  • Jyothi R; 4Department of Life Sciences, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Karnataka, India.
  • Kumar B; 5School of Pharmacy & Research, Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, Dehradun, India.
  • Patidar V; 6Department of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India.
Georgian Med News ; (344): 19-26, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236093
ABSTRACT
A fast implant is a kind of implant to place in the cavity right away after dental extraction. These implants are shown to maintain cervical marrow and reduce the number of surgery operations required for patients. The Photodynamic treatment (PDT) uses antimicrobial processes to supplement nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Combined through the scaling and root planning (SRP), and PDT is more effective. This study aims to assess the effects of PDT on initial findings with dental implants (DI) placed in patients having gum disease with SRP against patients who do not at the 12-month follow-up point. An aggregate of 25 implants were inserted in 16 patients, 12 of whom were in the test group (TG) and 13 of whom were in the control group (CG). SRP is conducted toward rapid implant assignment in the control site, while PDT as an adjunct to SRP (SRP + PDT) is executed prior to instant implant insertion in test sites. At the beginning, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months, gingival index, radiovisiographs, inquiring pocket intensity, clinical attachment level, and plaque index were obtained. Basic durability was assessed after implant insertion, and the recovery index was measured a week later. In this analysis, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique is used to predict tooth decay earlier. The CG experienced 1.10 mm of mean marginal bone loss after the 12-month research period, compared to 0.97 mm for the (SRP + PDT) group. After reaching the CG and TG, the differences in plaque score and probe depth were noteworthy. Clinical indicators compared to the basis in a year revealed unquestionable improvement, including the probing depth gingival index, plaque index and clinical attachment level. Twelve months were spent monitoring the implants in both groups. The little bone loss improved, although it isn't clinically important. The endurance rate for rapid implants in the PDT grouping is the same as that of the group that underwent SRP. The impact of PTD is utilized as a supplement to SRP. Yet, the consequence is marginal. Because of the improved results with PDT, it is used successfully as an addition to SRP.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Cárie Dentária Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas / Cárie Dentária Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article