Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The quality of life of frequently vs. infrequently screened HPV vaccinated women.
Taavela, Kaisa; Eriksson, Tiina; Huhtala, Heini; Bly, Anne; Harjula, Katja; Heikkilä, Kaisa; Hokkanen, Mari; Nummela, Mervi; Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura; Lehtinen, Matti; Louvanto, Karolina.
Afiliação
  • Taavela K; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
  • Eriksson T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Huhtala H; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Bly A; Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Harjula K; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Heikkilä K; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Hokkanen M; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Nummela M; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Kotaniemi-Talonen L; FICAN-Mid, Tampere, Finland.
  • Lehtinen M; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
  • Louvanto K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Qual Life Res ; 33(4): 941-949, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238599
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Cervical lesions caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are related to decreased quality of life (QoL) of women. Also, cervical cancer (CC) screening can cause psychological adverse effects. It has been assumed that by decreasing the HPV-related disease burden, HPV vaccinations would increase the QoL. This study compares the effect of CC screening on QoL of HPV vaccinated women in two different screening protocols.

METHODS:

A total of 753 HPV16/18 vaccinated women were randomized to frequent (22/25/28 years of age) and infrequent (28 years of age) CC screening arms. QoL questionnaires (EQ VAS, RAND 36, amended CECA 10) were sent at the age of 28.

RESULTS:

Median EQ VAS scores were 80 (Q1-Q3 75-90) in both screening arms. Mean RAND 36 scores of frequently and infrequently screened women were 78.13/81.64 in Physical role functioning domain and, respectively, 77.93/80.18 in Pain, 69.10/69.12 in General Health, 54.67/53.61 in Energy, 83.72/85.11 in Social functioning, 69.53/69.68 in Emotional role functioning, and 68.16/69.29 in Emotional well-being domain. Among women with a self-reported history of Pap cytology abnormalities, overall mean scores of amended CECA 10 were 69.52/72.07, and among women with a self-reported history of genital warts, 60.09/66.73, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

There was no significant difference in the QoL of HPV vaccinated women between the two CC screening arms. Women were mostly satisfied with the screening experience despite the screening frequency. This information is important for the future screening program planning as we need to reach the best possible balance with screening benefits and harms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02149030, date of registration 29/5/2014.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article