Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Double-tube burr hole irrigation in the treatment of subdural empyema following chronic subdural hematoma surgery: A case report.
Sakamoto, Manato; Yokoya, Shigeomi; Ichihashi, Midori; Kishida, Kengo; Oka, Hideki.
Afiliação
  • Sakamoto M; Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan. Electronic address: mnt-skmt@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
  • Yokoya S; Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
  • Ichihashi M; Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
  • Kishida K; Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
  • Oka H; Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 115: 109240, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241793
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE Subdural empyema (SE) following chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) surgery is an uncommon but serious complication. The best treatment approach, typically a choice between craniotomy and burr hole surgery, is still debated. This case report introduces an innovative method using burr hole surgery with double-tube irrigation, a potentially effective alternative to the more invasive craniotomy. CASE PRESENTATION An 81-year-old male, 48 days post-CSDH surgery, developed SE with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. The initial treatment with burr hole drainage was complicated by recurrence, leading to a second procedure with double tubes inserted anteriorly and posteriorly for continuous irrigation therapy. The patient was treated with systemic antibiotics and vancomycin irrigation, resulting in successful resolution without further recurrence. CLINICAL

DISCUSSION:

While burr hole surgery is often deemed less effective than craniotomy for SE, this case demonstrates the potential efficacy of double-tube irrigation via burr hole surgery. This method could be especially beneficial when craniotomy poses significant risks. Continuous irrigation could help in managing intracranial pressure, making the intervention safer. However, further research is needed to refine this technique and establish clear treatment guidelines.

CONCLUSION:

Burr hole surgery with double-tube irrigation emerges as a promising treatment option for SE, especially when craniotomy is not feasible. This approach's success in this case encourages further exploration and study to validate its wider application in similar clinical scenarios.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article