Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of video visit appropriateness for common symptoms seen in primary care: A retrospective cohort study.
Chen, Doris; Gonzales, Elyse; Winget, Marcy; Shaw, Jonathan; Artandi, Maja; Tsai, Sandra A; Nelligan, Ian.
Afiliação
  • Chen D; Department of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Gonzales E; Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Winget M; Department of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Shaw J; Department of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Artandi M; Department of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Tsai SA; Department of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Nelligan I; Department of Primary Care, San Francisco Free Clinic, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Telemed Telecare ; : 1357633X231224094, 2024 Jan 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254267
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Little is known about which conditions seen in primary care are appropriate for video visits. This study evaluated video visits compared to office visits for six conditions abdominal pain, joint pain, back pain, headache, chest pain, and dizziness.

METHODS:

Six hundred charts of adult patients from our institution's same-day outpatient clinic were reviewed in this study. Charts for video visits evaluating the aforementioned chief complaints that occurred between August and October 2020 were reviewed and compared with charts for office visits that occurred from August to September 2019. Frequencies of 3-week follow-up visits, Emergency Room visits, imaging, and referrals for office and video visits were measured. Reasons for in-person evaluation for patients seen by video were determined by review of clinician notes.

RESULTS:

Three-week in-person follow-up was more frequent for patients presenting with chest pain (52% vs 18%, p = 0.0007) and joint pain (24% vs 8%, p = 0.05) after video evaluation, relative to an office evaluation. Three-week in-person follow-up was also more frequent for patients presenting with dizziness (38% vs 28%) and low back pain (24% vs 14%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients presenting with headache and abdominal pain did not have a higher rate of follow-up.

DISCUSSION:

Based on the frequency of in-person follow-up, this study suggests that video visits are generally adequate for evaluating headache and abdominal pain. Patients with dizziness and chest pain have the highest frequency of in-person and Emergency Room follow-up within 3 weeks when first seen by video compared to other conditions evaluated and may be less suitable for an initial video visit. Institutions can consider these findings when scheduling and providing guidance to patients on what type of visit is most appropriate for their symptoms.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article