Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of urinary incontinence following endoscopic laser enucleation of the prostate by en-bloc and non- en-bloc techniques: a multicenter, real-world experience of 5068 patients.
Castellani, Daniele; Gauhar, Vineet; Fong, Khi Yung; Sofer, Mario; Socarrás, Moisés Rodríguez; Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N; Ying, Lie Kwok; Biligere, Sarvajit; Tiong, Ho Yee; Elterman, Dean; Mahajan, Abhay; Taratkin, Mark; Ivanovich, Sorokin Nikolai; Bhatia, Tanuj Pal; Enikeev, Dmitry; Gadzhiev, Nariman; Bendigeri, Mohammed Taif; Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun; Dellabella, Marco; Sancha, Fernando Gómez; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar; Herrmann, Thomas Reinhard William.
Afiliação
  • Castellani D; Urology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona 60127, Italy.
  • Gauhar V; Urology Unit, Marche University Hospital, Le Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona 60126, Italy.
  • Fong KY; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore 609606, Singapore.
  • Sofer M; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Socarrás MR; Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel.
  • Tursunkulov AN; Department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid 28701, Spain.
  • Ying LK; Urology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent 100211, Uzbekistan.
  • Biligere S; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore 609606, Singapore.
  • Tiong HY; Advanced Urology, Gleneagles Hospital, Singapore 258499, Singapore.
  • Elterman D; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore 609606, Singapore.
  • Mahajan A; Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
  • Taratkin M; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto M5G 2C4, Canada.
  • Ivanovich SN; Department of Urology, Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad 431003, India.
  • Bhatia TP; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow119435, Russian Federation.
  • Enikeev D; Department of Urology and Andrology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russian Federation.
  • Gadzhiev N; Department of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana 121006, India.
  • Bendigeri MT; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
  • Teoh JY; Department of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation.
  • Dellabella M; Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad 500082, India.
  • Sancha FG; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 96H2+Q9, China.
  • Somani BK; Urology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona 60127, Italy.
  • Herrmann TRW; Department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid 28701, Spain.
Asian J Androl ; 26(3): 233-238, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265232
ABSTRACT
We aim to evaluate the incidence of incontinence following laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) comparing en-bloc (Group 1) versus 2-lobe/3-lobe techniques (Group 2). We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing EEP for benign prostatic enlargement in 12 centers between January 2020 and January 2022. Data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). There were 1711 patients in Group 1 and 3357 patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 2 were significantly younger (68 [62-73] years vs 69 [63-74] years, P = 0.002). Median (interquartile range) prostate volume (PV) was similar between the groups (70 [52-92] ml in Group 1 vs 70 [54-90] ml in Group 2, P = 0.774). There was no difference in preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, or maximum flow rate. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly shorter in Group 1. Within 1 month, overall incontinence rate was 6.3% in Group 1 versus 5.3% in Group 2 ( P = 0.12), and urge incontinence was significantly higher in Group 1 (55.1% vs 37.3% in Group 2, P < 0.001). After 3 months, the overall rate of incontinence was 1.7% in Group 1 versus 2.3% in Group 2 ( P = 0.06), and SUI was significantly higher in Group 2 (55.6% vs 24.1% in Group 1, P = 0.002). At multivariable analysis, PV and IPSS were factors significantly associated with higher odds of transient SUI/MUI. PV, surgical time, and no early apical release technique were factors associated with higher odds of persistent SUI/MUI.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinência Urinária / Terapia a Laser Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinência Urinária / Terapia a Laser Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article