Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Bluetooth-Enabled Device for Real-Time Detection of Sitting, Standing, and Walking: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.
Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara, Reza; Rawstorn, Jonathan C; Dunstan, David W; Shariful Islam, Sheikh Mohammed; Abdelrazek, Mohamed; Kouzani, Abbas Z; Thummala, Poojith; McVicar, Jenna; Maddison, Ralph.
Afiliação
  • Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara R; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Rawstorn JC; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Dunstan DW; Baker-Deakin Department of Lifestyle and Diabetes, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Shariful Islam SM; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Abdelrazek M; School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Kouzani AZ; School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Thummala P; School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • McVicar J; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
  • Maddison R; Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood, Australia.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e47157, 2024 Jan 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265864
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study assesses the accuracy of a Bluetooth-enabled prototype activity tracker called the Sedentary behaviOR Detector (SORD) device in identifying sedentary, standing, and walking behaviors in a group of adult participants.

OBJECTIVE:

The primary objective of this study was to determine the criterion and convergent validity of SORD against direct observation and activPAL.

METHODS:

A total of 15 healthy adults wore SORD and activPAL devices on their thighs while engaging in activities (lying, reclining, sitting, standing, and walking). Direct observation was facilitated with cameras. Algorithms were developed using the Python programming language. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess the level of agreement.

RESULTS:

Overall, 1 model generated a low level of bias and high precision for SORD. In this model, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were all above 0.95 for detecting sitting, reclining, standing, and walking. Bland-Altman results showed that mean biases between SORD and direct observation were 0.3% for sitting and reclining (limits of agreement [LoA]=-0.3% to 0.9%), 1.19% for standing (LoA=-1.5% to 3.42%), and -4.71% for walking (LoA=-9.26% to -0.16%). The mean biases between SORD and activPAL were -3.45% for sitting and reclining (LoA=-11.59% to 4.68%), 7.45% for standing (LoA=-5.04% to 19.95%), and -5.40% for walking (LoA=-11.44% to 0.64%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Results suggest that SORD is a valid device for detecting sitting, standing, and walking, which was demonstrated by excellent accuracy compared to direct observation. SORD offers promise for future inclusion in theory-based, real-time, and adaptive interventions to encourage physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article