Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves implant position and early functional recovery for the knee with severe varus/valgus deformity.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA) facilitates precise bone resection and lower limb alignment, yet accuracy and functional recovery for severe varus/valgus deformity is not well-documented. The aim of study was to investigate whether r-TKA improves implant alignment in the coronal and sagittal view and early functional recovery compared to conventional TKA(c-TKA). METHODS: This comparative study included 86 patients with symptomatic knee arthritis who underwent primary TKA at our institution between 1st May and 31th November 2021. Radiological parameters evaluated included hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), femoral varus-valgus angle (FVVA), tibial varus-valgus angle (TVVA), posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), posterior condylar offset ratio, and Insall-Salvati index. Operative time, stay length, and complications were reviewed from patient records. The hospital for special surgery (HSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and knee joint motion range were evaluated at the six-month follow-up. RESULTS: The c-TKA and r-TKA groups had no significant differences in HKAA (179.73 ± 3.76°, range 172.10-188.90° vs. 180.53 ± 2.91°, range 173.30-188.32°, p = 0.277), FVVA (96.13 ± 2.61°, range 90.27-101.52° vs. 96.38 ± 2.23°, range 90.98-100.95°, p = 0.636), and TVVA (88.74 ± 2.03°, range 83.75-92.74° vs. 89.43 ± 1.83°, range 85.32-94.15°, p = 1.000). Outlier of mechanical alignment incidence (> 3°) was significantly lower in r-TKA compared with c-TKA, 17.50% (7/40) vs. 41.30% (19/46), (p = 0.017). PTSA of r-TKA remained significantly lower than c-TKA (p = 0.009) in mild-deformity patients. For severe varus/valgus deformity, r-TKA had a significantly lesser HKAA-outlier incidence (p = 0.025), PTSA-outlier incidence (p = 0.019), and lower PTSA (p < 0.001) compared with c-TKA. The r-TKA functional outcome was better than c-TKA regarding HSS (93.12 ± 1.97, range 90-95, 95%CI92.11-94.13 vs. 91.33 ± 2.50, range 85-95, 95%CI90.20-92.69, p = 0.036), and VAS (0.24 ± 0.44, range0-1 vs. 0.72 ± 0.75, range0-2, p = 0.026), knee joint flexion (118.53° ± 8.06, range 105-130°, 95%CI114.39-122.67° vs. 112.22 ± 8.09°, range 100-130°, 95%CI108.20-116.24° ,p = 0.027) for severe varus/valgus deformity. CONCLUSION: r-TKA improved lower-limb coronal alignment, sagittal implant position, and early functional recovery for patients with severe varus/valgus deformity of the knee. r-TKA did not confer substantial advantages over c-TKA in both radiological and clinical outcomes for the mild varus/valgus deformity.