Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on the Presence of Advance Care Planning Documents in Patients With Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
Issa, Tariq Z; McCurdy, Michael A; Lee, Yunsoo; Lambrechts, Mark J; Sherman, Matthew B; Kalra, Andrew; Goodman, Perry; Canseco, Jose A; Hilibrand, Alan S; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Schroeder, Gregory D; Kepler, Christopher K.
Afiliação
  • Issa TZ; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (Issa, McCurdy, Lee, Sherman, Kalra, Goodman, Canseco, Hilibrand, Vaccaro, Schroeder, and Kepler), the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (Issa), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (Lambrechts).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(8): 354-361, 2024 Apr 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271675
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patients presenting with spinal cord injury (SCI) often times have notable deficits or polytrauma and may require urgent decision making for early management. However, their presentation may affect decision-making ability. Although advance care planning (ACP) may help guide spine surgeons as to patient preferences, the rate at which they are available and disparities in ACP completion are still not understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate disparities in the completion of ACP among patients with acute SCI.

METHODS:

All patients presenting with cervical SCI to the emergency department at an urban, tertiary level I trauma center from 2010 to 2021 were identified from a prospective database of all consults evaluated by the spine service. Each patient's medical record was reviewed to assess for the presence of ACP documents such as living will, power of attorney, or advance directive. Community-level socioeconomic status was assessed using the Distressed Communities Index. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

We identified 424 patients 104 (24.5%) of whom had ACP. Patients with ACP were older (64.8 versus 56.5 years, P = 0.001), more likely White (78.8% versus 71.9%, P = 0.057), and present with ASIA Impairment Scale grade A SCI (21.2% versus 12.8%, P = 0.054), although the latter two did not reach statistical significance. On multivariable logistic regression, patients residing in at-risk communities were significantly less likely to have ACP documents compared with those in prosperous communities (odds ratio [OR] 0.29, P = 0.03). Although patients living in distressed communities were less likely to complete ACP compared with those in prosperous communities (OR 0.50, P = 0.066), this did not meet statistical significance. Female patients were also less likely to have ACP (OR 0.43, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION:

Female patients and those from at-risk communities are markedly less likely to complete ACP. Attention to possible disparities during admission and ACP discussions may help ensure that patients of all backgrounds have treatment goals documented.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados / Medula Cervical Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados / Medula Cervical Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article