Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between combination of tamsulosin and Pentoxifylline versus tamsulosin alone in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate hyperplasia: A preliminary study.
Shirazi, Mehdi; Dehghanmanshadi, Alireza; Sadr, Soroush; Jahanabadi, Zahra.
Afiliação
  • Shirazi M; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Dehghanmanshadi A; Histomorphometry and Stereology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Sadr S; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Jahanabadi Z; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms ; 16(1): e12509, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282138
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In older adults, bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is prevalent, primarily due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). These patients' lower urinary tract symptoms can be treated surgically and with medical therapy. Compared to standard treatment with tamsulosin, Pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could benefit patients with BOO due to its properties on microcirculatory blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues. Hence, this trial intended to study the efficacy of Pentoxifylline combined with tamsulosin in treating BOO patients. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial recruited 60 patients with BPH from a single center in 2022. Upon consent of patients meeting the eligibility criteria, they were randomly allocated to intervention (Pentoxifylline + tamsulosin) and control (placebo + tamsulosin) groups. The patients were evaluated for international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) by uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume (PVR) by abdominal sonography at the onset of the study and after the 12th week.

RESULTS:

Patients who used the combination therapy had significantly better results of prostate symptoms and quality of life improvement (IPSS -36.6%, QoL -45.3%) compared to patients who received tamsulosin alone (IPSS -21.2%, QoL -27.7%) (p < .001). Also, this study shows that the improvement in maximum urinary flow rate and residual volume by combination therapy is significantly higher (Qmax +42.5%, PVR -42.6%) compared to monotherapy (Qmax +25.1%, PVR -26.1%) (p < .001).

CONCLUSION:

When combined with tamsulosin, Pentoxifylline could significantly improve the lower urinary symptoms of BPH patients. It is well tolerated, and the treatment outcomes are better in patients who receive the combination of Pentoxifylline and tamsulosin than those who only receive tamsulosin.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pentoxifilina / Hiperplasia Prostática / Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pentoxifilina / Hiperplasia Prostática / Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article