Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-sectional study of the associations between the implementation of the WHO FCTC tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship bans and current e-cigarette use among youth from countries with different income levels.
Ylitörmänen, Tuija; Tarasenko, Yelena; Hiilamo, Heikki; Ruokolainen, Otto; Puska, Pekka; Ollila, Hanna.
Afiliação
  • Ylitörmänen T; Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland tuija.ylitormanen@thl.fi.
  • Tarasenko Y; Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.
  • Hiilamo H; Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Ruokolainen O; Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Puska P; Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Ollila H; Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Tob Control ; 2024 Jan 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286590
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Article 13 requires countries to ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS), and bans are recommended to cover electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We examined youth e-cigarette prevalence by TAPS regulations in countries with different income levels.

METHODS:

We analysed data on 165 299 respondents from 48 countries with 2016/2018 WHO FCTC implementation reports and 2016-2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. We used multilevel logistic regressions to examine associations between TAPS regulations and current e-cigarette use, stratified by country income.

RESULTS:

About 1 in 10 respondents was currently using e-cigarettes. Respondents in countries with TAPS bans on the internet were less likely to use e-cigarettes (adjOR=0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86) than youth in countries without such bans. In lower middle-income and low-income countries, bans on displaying tobacco products at the point of sale (adjOR=0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90), bans on product placement (adjOR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.69) and strength of additional TAPS measures were associated with lower prevalence of e-cigarette use among students. Being taught about the dangers of the use of tobacco in school was associated with lower odds of e-cigarette use. No differences in the use of e-cigarettes were observed by types of TAPS among respondents in high-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS:

Strengthening implementation of TAPS policies and assuring they cover new and emerging products, online channels and points of sales are essential, especially in lower income countries. Maintaining tobacco health education is also important to protect youth from e-cigarette use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article