Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of anaemia among married women with recent birth history and high-risk fertility behaviour: secondary data analysis of the National Family Health Survey-India (2019-21).
Das, Milan; Verma, Madhur; Barman, Papai; Behera, Deepak Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Das M; International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Verma M; Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India drmadhurverma@gmail.com.
  • Barman P; International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Behera DK; Economics and Finance Department, The Business School, RMIT International University of Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
BMJ Open ; 14(1): e073395, 2024 01 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296277
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To describe the prevalence of anaemia among currently married women with high-risk fertility behaviour (HRFB) based on age, parity and birth spacing indicators.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study. SETTINGS AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) was conducted in India (2019-2021) and included a nationally representative sample of 724, 115 women in the reproductive age group (15-49). Our analysis focused exclusively on married women who had given birth in the preceding 5 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The prevalence of anaemia with HRFB was the primary outcome, and the likelihood of having anaemia due to HRFB was the secondary outcome. DATA AND

METHODS:

Secondary data analysis of the NFHS-5 (2019-2021) datasets was done using a weighted analysis to determine anaemia prevalence in different HRFB categories. Bivariate analysis was done using the χ2 test, and multiple binary logistic regression analyses were done to estimate the odds of having anaemia due to HRFB after adjusting for known confounders. A p value <0.05 was reported as statistically significant.

RESULTS:

The final analysis comprised 145,468 women, of whom 59.1% had anaemia. About 53.1% of women depicted 'No risk' fertility behaviour, and 34.6% and 12.3% had single and multiple HRFB. Women with 'no-risk,' single and multiple HRFB had anaemia prevalence rates of 58.1%, 59.4% and 63.1%, respectively. Women with 'Single risk' had an 18% higher likelihood (1.18; 1.13-1.22) of having anaemia after controlling for confounding variables, compared with the HRFB category with 'No risk.' Women with 'Multiple risks' showed a 6% higher likelihood (adjusted OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.08).

CONCLUSIONS:

Anaemia remains a prevalent issue in India, and HRFB is observed as a significant contributing factor. This vulnerable group can be targeted through multiple interventions and further our efforts to realise our anaemia-related goals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: História Reprodutiva / Anemia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: História Reprodutiva / Anemia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article