Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cefoxitin for Intra-amniotic Infections and Endometritis: A Retrospective Comparison to Traditional Antimicrobial Therapy Regimens Within a Healthcare System.
Bailey, Pamela; Schacht, Lance; Pazienza, Grace; Kohn, Joseph; Yunusa, Ismaeel; Seal, Patricia; Crockett, Amy; Justo, Julie Ann.
Afiliação
  • Bailey P; Division of Infectious Diseases, Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Schacht L; University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Pazienza G; University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Kohn J; Department of Internal Medicine, Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Yunusa I; Division of Infectious Diseases, Prisma Health Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Seal P; College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Crockett A; College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • Justo JA; University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(1): 247-254, 2024 Jul 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297884
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Local institutional guidelines and order sets were updated in June 2023 to recommend first-line cefoxitin monotherapy for the treatment of intra-amniotic infections (IAIs) and endometritis. This study evaluated the clinical impact of this change.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study in an 11-campus health system comparing clinical outcomes of patients with chorioamnionitis, endometritis, or septic abortion receiving intravenous antimicrobial therapy before and after implementation of first-line cefoxitin monotherapy recommendations for the treatment of these infections. Primary outcome was a composite of serious clinical events postdelivery (ie, intensive care unit admission, death, hospital readmission related to IAI or endometritis within 30 days, additional surgery or procedures, or deep surgical site infection). Baseline characteristics between the pre- and post-cefoxitin groups were compared via Student's t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Outcomes were evaluated via generalized linear modeling.

RESULTS:

A total of 472 patients were enrolled, 350 (74%) in the pre-cefoxitin group and 122 (26%) in the post-cefoxitin group. Groups were significantly different by race, healthcare payor, and hospital campus. Cefoxitin was rarely used in the pre-cefoxitin group (n = 2, <0.1%) and commonly used in the post-cefoxitin group (n = 112, 91.8%). After controlling for group differences, odds of experiencing serious clinical event postdelivery in the post-cefoxitin group were noninferior to those in the pre-cefoxitin group (adjusted odds ratio, .37; 95% CI, .17-.76; P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS:

Local institutional guidelines with predominant use of cefoxitin therapy were noninferior to traditional antimicrobial therapy regimens for the treatment of IAI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefoxitina / Endometrite / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefoxitina / Endometrite / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article