Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis.
Bodmer, Nicolas S; Christensen, Dylan G; Bachmann, Lucas M; Faes, Livia; Sanak, Frantisek; Iselin, Katja; Kaufmann, Claude; Thiel, Michael A; Baenninger, Philipp B.
Afiliação
  • Bodmer NS; Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Christensen DG; Medignition Inc. Research Consultants Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Bachmann LM; University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Faes L; Medignition Inc. Research Consultants Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Sanak F; Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Iselin K; Medignition Inc. Research Consultants Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kaufmann C; Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Thiel MA; Medignition Inc. Research Consultants Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Baenninger PB; NIHR Biomedical Research Center at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Cornea ; 2024 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300179
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The prevalence of keratoconus in the general population is reported to be up to 1 of 84. Over the past 2 decades, diagnosis and management evolved rapidly, but keratoconus screening in clinical practice is still challenging and asks for improving the accuracy of keratoconus detection. Deep learning (DL) offers considerable promise for improving the accuracy and speed of medical imaging interpretation. We establish an inventory of studies conducted with DL algorithms that have attempted to diagnose keratoconus.

METHODS:

This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. We searched (Pre-)MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, arXiv document server, and Google Scholar from inception to February 18, 2022. We included studies that evaluated the performance of DL algorithms in the diagnosis of keratoconus. The main outcome was diagnostic performance measured as sensitivity and specificity, and the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2.

RESULTS:

Searches retrieved 4100 nonduplicate records, and we included 19 studies in the qualitative synthesis and 10 studies in the exploratory meta-analysis. The overall study quality was limited because of poor reporting of patient selection and the use of inadequate reference standards. We found a pooled sensitivity of 97.5% (95% confidence interval, 93.6%-99.0%) and a pooled specificity of 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 85.7%-99.5%) for topography images as input.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our systematic review found that the overall diagnostic performance of DL models to detect keratoconus was good, but the methodological quality of included studies was modest.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article