Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate weightbearing is safe after revision total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic femur fractures.
Gopinath, Rohan; Oster, Brittany A; Mixa, Patrick J; Costales, Timothy G; Johnson, Aaron J; Manson, Theodore T.
Afiliação
  • Gopinath R; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US.
  • Oster BA; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US.
  • Mixa PJ; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US.
  • Costales TG; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US.
  • Johnson AJ; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US.
  • Manson TT; University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, 21201, US; The University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, 7601 Osler Dr., Towson, MD 21204, US. Electronic address: tmanson@towsonortho.com.
Injury ; 55(3): 111384, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301488
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Modular fluted, tapered stems provide a reliable treatment for Vancouver B2/B3 fractures. Historically, these patients had weightbearing restrictions postoperatively. Although full immediate postoperative weightbearing may provide benefits in this patient population, stem subsidence is a concern. QUESTIONS/

PURPOSES:

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of post-operative weight-bearing status on stem subsidence in patients treated with modular tapered stems for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures. We sought to answer two questions (1) Does full immediate postoperative weightbearing after revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic femur fracture lead to increased stem subsidence compared to protected weightbearing? (2) Is there a mortality difference between these two groups of patients with different weightbearing restrictions?

METHODS:

From 2009 to 2015 all patients who underwent revision for Vancouver B2/B3 fractures were made non-weightbearing (NWB) for six weeks postoperatively. After 2015, immediate weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) was allowed postoperatively. We compared stem subsidence between immediate postoperative and final radiographs. Additionally, we performed a Kaplan-Meijer analysis with one-year mortality as an endpoint.

RESULTS:

The final cohort included forty-seven patients with an average follow-up of 254 days. The average stem subsidence was 1.0 mm (95 % CI, 0.5-1.5 mm) in the NWB cohort and 0.3 mm (95 % CI, 0-0.7 mm) in the WBAT cohort (P = 0.10). In our survivorship analysis, we noted no deaths in the WBAT cohort compared to 17 % mortality in the NWB cohort at the one-year timepoint.

CONCLUSION:

Allowing patients to weight bear immediately after revision does not increase stem subsidence. Further studies are needed to determine whether early weightbearing provides a mortality benefit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas / Fraturas do Fêmur / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas / Fraturas do Fêmur / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article