Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image quality.
Tonkopi, Elena; Tetteh, Mercy Afadzi; Gunn, Catherine; Ashraf, Haseem; Rusten, Sigrid Lia; Safi, Perkhah; Tinsoe, Nora Suu; Colford, Kylie; Ouellet, Olivia; Naimi, Salma; Johansen, Safora.
Afiliação
  • Tonkopi E; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Tetteh MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Gunn C; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Ashraf H; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Loerenskog, Norway.
  • Rusten SL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Safi P; School of Health Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Tinsoe NS; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Loerenskog, Norway.
  • Colford K; Medicine Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo Norway.
  • Ouellet O; Health Faculty, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo, Norway.
  • Naimi S; Health Faculty, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo, Norway.
  • Johansen S; Health Faculty, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo, Norway.
Acta Radiol Open ; 13(1): 20584601241228220, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304118
ABSTRACT

Background:

Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship.

Purpose:

The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada. Material and

methods:

Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample t-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners.

Results:

The ANOVA test revealed significant differences (p < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values.

Conclusion:

The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article