Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An evaluation of CT radiation doses within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial.
Iball, Gareth R; Beeching, Charlotte E; Gabe, Rhian; Tam, Hui Zhen; Darby, Michael; Crosbie, Philip A J; Callister, Matthew E J.
Afiliação
  • Iball GR; Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.
  • Beeching CE; Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
  • Gabe R; Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
  • Tam HZ; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom.
  • Darby M; Barts Clinical Trials Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom.
  • Crosbie PAJ; Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
  • Callister MEJ; Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, M13 9NT, United Kingdom.
Br J Radiol ; 97(1154): 469-476, 2024 Feb 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308037
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate radiation doses for all low-dose CT scans performed during the first year of a lung screening trial.

METHODS:

For all lung screening scans that were performed using a CT protocol that delivered image quality meeting the RSNA QIBA criteria, radiation dose metrics, participant height, weight, gender, and age were recorded. Values of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were evaluated as a function of weight in order to assess the performance of the scan protocol across the participant cohort. Calculated effective doses were used to establish the additional lifetime attributable cancer risks arising from trial scans.

RESULTS:

Median values of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose (IQR) from the 3521 scans were 1.1 mGy (0.70), 42.4 mGycm (24.9), and 1.15 mSv (0.67), whilst for 60-80kg participants the values were 1.0 mGy (0.30), 35.8 mGycm (11.4), and 0.97 mSv (0.31). A statistically significant correlation between CTDIvol and weight was identified for males (r = 0.9123, P < .001) and females (r = 0.9052, P < .001), however, the effect of gender on CTDIvol was not statistically significant (P = .2328) despite notable differences existing at the extremes of the weight range. The additional lifetime attributable cancer risks from a single scan were in the range 0.001%-0.006%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Low radiation doses can be achieved across a typical lung screening cohort using scan protocols that have been shown to deliver high levels of image quality. The observed dose levels may be considered as typical values for lung screening scans on similar types of scanners for an equivalent participant cohort. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Presentation of typical radiation dose levels for CT lung screening examinations in a large UK trial. Effective radiation doses can be of the order of 1 mSv for standard sized participants. Lifetime attributable cancer risks resulting from a single low-dose CT scan did not exceed 0.006%.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pulmão / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pulmão / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article