Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy and Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Testing in Eye Clinic and Emergency Department Patients with Vision Complaints.
Theophanous, Rebecca G; Gordee, Alexander; Peethumnongsin, Erica; Huang, Wennie; Gurysh, Kevin; Coco, Matthew; Campos, Santiago Cantillo; Ruderman, Brandon; Kuchibhatla, Maragatha; Broder, Joshua.
Afiliação
  • Theophanous RG; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Gordee A; Department of Biostatistics.
  • Peethumnongsin E; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Huang W; Department of Emergency Medicine; Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Gurysh K; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Coco M; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Campos SC; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Ruderman B; Department of Emergency Medicine.
  • Kuchibhatla M; Department of Biostatistics.
  • Broder J; Department of Emergency Medicine.
J Emerg Med ; 66(2): 197-210, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309979
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ocular emergencies comprise 2-3% of emergency department (ED) visits, with retinal detachment requiring emergency surgery. Two-dimensional ultrasound is a rapid bedside tool but is highly operator dependent.

OBJECTIVE:

We determined three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) feasibility, acceptability, and usability in eye pathology detection using the ophthalmologist examination as reference standard.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective, blinded cohort study of a 3DUS-enabling device in 30 eye clinic and ED patients with visual symptoms and calculated 3DUS performance characteristics. Two expert readers interpreted the 3DUS images for pathology. All participants completed surveys.

RESULTS:

3DUS sensitivity was 0.81, specificity 0.73, positive predictive value 0.54, negative predictive value 0.91, and likelihood ratio (LR)+/LR- 3.03 and 0.26, respectively. Novice and expert sonographers had "substantial" agreement in correct diagnosis of abnormal vs. normal (κ = 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.88). Most patients indicated that 3DUS is fast, comfortable, helps them understand their problem, and improves provider interaction/care, and all sonographers agreed; 4/5 sonographers felt confident performing ultrasound. Expert readers correctly identified an abnormal eye in 83/120 scans (76%) and correct diagnosis in 72/120 scans (65%), with no statistical difference between novice (79%; 69%) and expert (72%; 61%) sonographers (p = 0.39, p = 0.55), suggesting reduced operator dependence. Reader diagnosis confidence and image quality varied widely. Image acquisition times were fast for novice (mean 225 ± 83 s) and expert (201 ± 51) sonographers, with fast expert reader interpretation times (225 ± 136).

CONCLUSIONS:

A 3DUS-enabling device demonstrates a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.73 for disease detection, fast image acquisition, and may reduce operator dependence for detecting emergent retinal pathologies. Further technological development is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy in identifying and characterizing retinal pathology.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article