Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step.
Abugu, Ezinne U; Harper, Sara A; Kim, Youngwook; Bolton, David A E.
Afiliação
  • Abugu EU; Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. Electronic address: abuguezinne@gmail.com.
  • Harper SA; Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Sorenson Center for Clinical Excellence, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Kinesiology Department, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA. Electronic address: sara.harper@uah.edu.
  • Kim Y; Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Sorenson Center for Clinical Excellence, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Kyungil University, 50, Gamasil-gil, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: youngwookkim@ki
  • Bolton DAE; Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA; Sorenson Center for Clinical Excellence, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. Electronic address: dave.bolton@usu.edu.
Gait Posture ; 107: 281-286, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349937
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG). It is unclear if the same neural networks contribute to suppressing an unwanted balance reaction. RESEARCH QUESTION Is there greater IFG activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step?

METHODS:

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity in 21 young adults as they performed a balance recovery task that demanded rapid step suppression following postural perturbation. The hypothesis was that the IFG would show heightened activity when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step. A lean and-release system was used to impose temporally unpredictable forward perturbations by releasing participants from a supported forward lean. For most trials (80%), participants were told to recover balance by quickly stepping forward (STEP). However, on 20% of trials at random, a high-pitch tone was played immediately after postural perturbation signaling participants to suppress a step and fully relax into a catch harness (STOP). This allowed us to target the ability to cancel an already initiated step in a balance recovery context. Average oxygenated hemoglobin changes were contrasted between STEP and STOP trials, 1-6 s post perturbation.

RESULTS:

The results showed a greater bilateral prefrontal response during STOP trials, supporting the idea that executive brain networks are active when suppressing a balance recovery step.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Our study demonstrates one way in which higher brain processes may help us prevent falls in complex environments where behavioral flexibility is necessary. This study also presents a novel method for assessing response inhibition in an upright postural context where rapid stepping reactions are required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Córtex Pré-Frontal Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encéfalo / Córtex Pré-Frontal Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article