Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prefabricated shouldered abutments enable successful restoration of molar crowns on implants.
Cheng, Yu-Chi; Perpetuini, Paolo; Marincola, Mauro; Speratti, Drauseo; Murcko, Laura; Hirayama, Muneki; Benalcázar-Jalkh, Ernesto B; Bonfante, Estevam A.
Afiliação
  • Cheng YC; School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Perpetuini P; Laboratorio Odontotechnico, Cisterna di Latina, Italy.
  • Marincola M; Dental Implant Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
  • Speratti D; Dental Institute, Midwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Murcko L; Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hirayama M; Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Benalcázar-Jalkh EB; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
  • Bonfante EA; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 26(2): 457-466, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361143
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This retrospective study evaluated the effect of selected clinical and patient factors on survival, success, and peri-implant bone level changes of locking taper implants supporting molar crowns on Bicon's prefabricated shouldered abutments.

METHODS:

A total of 234 patients, who received 274 single molar crowns supported by locking taper implants were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall implant survival, prostheses survival, and success. Crowns were either monolithic (resin based) or bilayered (milled fiber-reinforced composite coping veneered with indirect composite). Early and late changes in marginal bone levels were plotted and analyzed with equivalence testing to compare the effects of different factors on crestal bone levels.

RESULTS:

At 9.5 years after implant surgery, the implant survival probability was 94.2%, the probability of prosthesis survival was 91.4%, and the probability of prosthetic success was 90.4%. Neither the use of different crown materials, nor the choice of monolithic versus bilayered crown construction, significantly affected the probability of prosthetic success. Marginal bone levels, on average, trended downwards towards the top of the implant within the first 2 years after functional loading, and remained stable on average, since then. Factors affecting bone levels included the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which precluded early implant bone loss; and subcrestal implant placement, which was linked to significantly higher long-term bone levels.

CONCLUSION:

The implant and abutment system studied resulted in high implant and prosthetic survival rates, regardless of prosthetic material used, with stable bone levels over time.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article