Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Functional outcomes of different surgical treatments for common peroneal nerve injuries: a retrospective comparative study.
Pang, Zhen; Zhu, Shuai; Shen, Yun-Dong; Qiu, Yan-Qun; Liu, Yu-Qi; Xu, Wen-Dong; Yin, Hua-Wei.
Afiliação
  • Pang Z; Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhu S; Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Shen YD; Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Qiu YQ; Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Liu YQ; Department of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
  • Xu WD; Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Yin HW; Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 64, 2024 Feb 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368360
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to assess the recovery patterns and factors influencing outcomes in patients with common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included 45 patients with CPN injuries treated between 2009 and 2019 in Jing'an District Central Hospital. The surgical interventions were categorized into three groups neurolysis (group A; n = 34 patients), nerve repair (group B; n = 5 patients) and tendon transfer (group C; n = 6 patients). Preoperative and postoperative sensorimotor functions were evaluated using the British Medical Research Council grading system. The outcome of measures included the numeric rating scale, walking ability, numbness and satisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal time interval between injury and surgery for predicting postoperative foot dorsiflexion function, toe dorsiflexion function, and sensory function.

RESULTS:

Surgical interventions led to improvements in foot dorsiflexion strength in all patient groups, enabling most to regain independent walking ability. Group A (underwent neurolysis) had significant sensory function restoration (P < 0.001), and three patients in Group B (underwent nerve repair) had sensory improvements. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal time interval for achieving M3 foot dorsiflexion recovery was 9.5 months, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 (95% CI = 0.661-1.000, P = 0.040). For M4 foot dorsiflexion recovery, the optimal cut-off was 5.5 months, with an AUC of 0.785 (95% CI = 0.575-0.995, P = 0.020). When using M3 toe dorsiflexion recovery or S4 sensory function recovery as the gold standard, the optimal cut-off remained at 5.5 months, with AUCs of 0.768 (95% CI = 0.582-0.953, P = 0.025) and 0.853 (95% CI = 0.693-1.000, P = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study highlights the importance of early surgical intervention in CPN injury recovery, with optimal outcomes achieved when surgery is performed within 5.5 to 9.5 months post-injury. These findings provide guidance for clinicians in tailoring treatment plans to the specific characteristics and requirements of CPN injury patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nervo Fibular / Neuropatias Fibulares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nervo Fibular / Neuropatias Fibulares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article