Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fresh Frozen Plasma Versus Solvent Detergent Plasma for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Priming in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
van Minnen, Olivier; van den Bergh, Walter M; Kneyber, Martin C J; Accord, Ryan E; Buys, Dedré; Meier, Sascha.
Afiliação
  • van Minnen O; Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: o.van.minnen@umcg.nl.
  • van den Bergh WM; Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Kneyber MCJ; Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Accord RE; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Buys D; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Meier S; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(5): 1144-1149, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383273
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Compared with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), Omniplasma has been attributed to an increased coagulation potential and an increased fibrinolytic potential. This study aimed to compare Omniplasma and FFP used for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) priming regarding the incidence of postoperative thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications and outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN:

A retrospective observational cohort study

SETTING:

This single-center study was performed at the University Medical Center Groningen. PARTICIPANT All pediatric patients up to 10 kg undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

INTERVENTIONS:

Procedures in which FFP was used for CPB priming were compared with those in which Omniplasma was used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

The primary outcome parameter was a composite endpoint consisting of the following (1) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality, (2) thromboembolic complications, and (3) hemorrhagic complications during PICU stay. The authors included 143 procedures in the analyses, 90 (63%) in the FFP group and 53 (37%) in the Omniplasma group. The occurrence of the combined primary endpoint (FFP 20% v Omniplasma 11%, p = 0.18) and its components did not differ between the used CPB priming agent). Omniplasma for CPB priming was associated with decreased unfractionated heparin administration per kg bodyweight (585 IU v 510 IU, p = 0.03), higher preoperative and postoperative activated clotting times (ACT) discrepancy (90% v 94%, p = 0.03), a lower postoperative ACT value (125 v 118 seconds, p = 0.01), and less red blood cell transfusion per kilogram bodyweight (78 v 55 mL, p = 0.02). However, none of the variables differed statistically significantly in the multivariate logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors did not find an association between the plasma used for CPB priming and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and death in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Omniplasma seems to be safe to use in this population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tromboembolia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos Limite: Child / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tromboembolia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos Limite: Child / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article