Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning methods for genomic prediction of cow behavioral traits measured by automatic milking systems in North American Holstein cattle.
Pedrosa, Victor B; Chen, Shi-Yi; Gloria, Leonardo S; Doucette, Jarrod S; Boerman, Jacquelyn P; Rosa, Guilherme J M; Brito, Luiz F.
Afiliação
  • Pedrosa VB; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
  • Chen SY; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
  • Gloria LS; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
  • Doucette JS; Agriculture Information Technology (AgIT), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
  • Boerman JP; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
  • Rosa GJM; Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706.
  • Brito LF; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Electronic address: britol@purdue.edu.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(7): 4758-4771, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38395400
ABSTRACT
Identifying genome-enabled methods that provide more accurate genomic prediction is crucial when evaluating complex traits such as dairy cow behavior. In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive performance of traditional genomic prediction methods and deep learning algorithms for genomic prediction of milking refusals (MREF) and milking failures (MFAIL) in North American Holstein cows measured by automatic milking systems (milking robots). A total of 1,993,509 daily records from 4,511 genotyped Holstein cows were collected by 36 milking robot stations. After quality control, 57,600 SNPs were available for the analyses. Four genomic prediction methods were considered Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multiple layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and GBLUP. We implemented the first 3 methods using the Keras and TensorFlow libraries in Python (v.3.9) but the GBLUP method was implemented using the BLUPF90+ family programs. The accuracy of genomic prediction (mean square error) for MREF and MFAIL was 0.34 (0.08) and 0.27 (0.08) based on LASSO, 0.36 (0.09) and 0.32 (0.09) for MLP, 0.37 (0.08) and 0.30 (0.09) for CNN, and 0.35 (0.09) and 0.31(0.09) based on GBLUP, respectively. Additionally, we observed a lower reranking of top selected individuals based on the MLP versus CNN methods compared with the other approaches for both MREF and MFAIL. Although the deep learning methods showed slightly higher accuracies than GBLUP, the results may not be sufficient to justify their use over traditional methods due to their higher computational demand and the difficulty of performing genomic prediction for nongenotyped individuals using deep learning procedures. Overall, this study provides insights into the potential feasibility of using deep learning methods to enhance genomic prediction accuracy for behavioral traits in livestock. Further research is needed to determine their practical applicability to large dairy cattle breeding programs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genômica / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genômica / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article